Archive for the 'Australia' Category

The Short End of the Global Economy

Posted in Public Affairs, Money Matters, wordpress, disclosure, ethics, oversight, United States, China, Chrysler, Foreign Affairs, Australia, Japan on September 18th, 2008 by Stanford Matthews

investingWhile the payback for the greed in the subprime market continues to punish US financial markets and some of the perpetrators’ businesses, co-conspirators around the world are experiencing a similar fate. While liberal politicians in America love to criticize the Bush Administration for what they call failed policies including China’s practice of holding America’s debt, Asian financials are beginning to bleed just like those in the US. On news of money troubles in the US, markets in China, Japan, Korea, Australia and elsewhere across the region are duplicating stock market losses on Wall Street.

HONG KONG (MarketWatch) — Hong Kong stocks tumbled Thursday as panic-stricken investors sold off shares across-the-board amid a raging global financial crisis, forcing the benchmark indexes down for a seventh straight session and to levels not seen in more than two years.

The market in China lost 7% after the American taxpayer bailed out AIG and it lost more than 15% in the previous two sessions. As much as other countries enjoy bad mouthing the US when it comes to finance and greed nations of the world share this common bond of human vulnerability. Markets in Japan, South Korea and Australia lost between 3 and 4% mimicing US losses that exceeded 4%. As far as credit markets are concerned, if those comparing current money woes to the Great Depression look around they will find the entire planet poised to take a beating on past and current practice in investing and lack of discipline.

As the US Fed punishes Lehman but props up Bear, Fannie, Freddie and AIG, Japan and Australia injected billions into the money markets while Chinese money pundits claim their is liquidity available. Now that one of the usual suspects in the subprime scandal puts itself up for sale, WAMU is being looked at by the likes of Citigroup and others who have had their own problems with holding too much bad paper. So much for those predicting the bottom of the financial crisis across the planet. Even though the US has weathered similar predicaments in the past and calls for measures duplicating the response to the S&L debacle of the eighties abound the common concern finds the growing panic focused on how bad, how long and what will this do to me.

One sensible approach suggested in current reports was the need for ailing banks to merge in an effort to shore up weak balance sheets. Misery may love company but the wisdom of this strategy still requires all players to abandon excesses of taking on unlimited risk and returning to practices that resemble the Puritan ethic of hard work and discipline as well as the old fashioned notion of simply doing what’s right. The odds seem very long on that probability.

sheepBank of America and Barclay’s withdrew interest in aiding the AIG bailout when the Fed refused to guarantee them against failure. But no one seems to mind risking the American taxpayer’s money in times like these. The classic example of Lee Iacocca and Chrysler being balied out by the Fed in the late seventies and eighties cites everything worked out and no one lost. It’s a nice fairy tale but according to the Heritage Foundation, ‘ And so is the myth of the Great Chrysler Comeback of the once dying automaker has become the favorite example cited by proponents of national industrial policy who call for massive and costly federal efforts to revive what they describe as a des perately ailing American economy.’ Sham stock certificates were eaten by holders of record, creditors took losses just like a normal bankruptcy, thousands of workers were laid off and in general the bailout was not a bailout or the perfect story often reported. This may be part of the public opinion guide to be used by observers of the current strategy of government intervention supported as usual by taxpayer funding.

As for the millions facing foreclosure some of the homeowners may not be of the speculator variety. Not that it si possible or even advisable in all cases but there seems to be some wisdom in attempting to right the ship of many borrowers and allowing the chance to repay debt even in the shadow of recent defaults. Besides, thinkthe typical scenario of liquidating foreclosed properties to the vultures in waiting may only exacerbate an already tenuous mirage of a remedy. As REOs are unloaded at auction real estate prices of the surrounding properties may also take a hit placing more pressure on falling home prices. The properties as collateral for outstanding mortgages on the remaining stock of homes across the nation are then at least changed in loan to value ratios causing more problems for the banking industry.

But with banks hoarding cash in an attempt to weather the storm finding sources for restructuring home mortgages may just be a pipe dream So like the FED bailing out AIG, allowing the remaining problems to sort themselves out or offering government assistance in the form of taxpayer subsidies or guarantees really offers no insight into how this whole mess will play out. But it would not be a surprise if all the little guys get crushed by the outcome while fat cats like the CEOs and their golden parachutes skate the justice of paying for their sins. Life’s not fair and whatever the final verdict there will be plenty of casualties and plenty of examples of those who were enriched at other’s expense. Maybe more a case of survival of the most sinister rather than the fittest and the whole thing will take longer than we would like to play out.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Australia to Review Controversial Citizenship Tests

Posted in Public Affairs, wordpress, Politics, Immigration, Law, Foreign Affairs, Australia on January 3rd, 2008 by Stanford Matthews

Mercer report - Download MP3 (223k) audio clip
Listen to Mercer report audio clip

Refugee children from Africa that now reside in AustraliaAustralia’s new left-of-center Labor government says it will review a controversial citizenship test. Some people are critical of the test’s high rate of failure by applicants, who are quizzed about Australian history, culture and political system. From Sydney, Phil Mercer reports.

Australia’s citizenship test was introduced by the former conservative government last October to ensure that new citizens are committed to the country’s broad values and aware of its indigenous and colonial history.

Ten thousand six hundred people have taken the exam, but one in five test takers has failed to reach the 60 percent passing mark. That has prompted the new Labor Party administration to review the process.

Australian Immigration Minister Chris Evans says the exam should concentrate more on increasing awareness of citizens’ responsibilities rather than on history. A review will begin soon.

The tests have been controversial and have been criticized as racist and discriminatory.

Some opponents want them abolished.

Mark Gudkamp from the Refugee Action Coalition says migrants must be allowed to learn about their adopted home in a more relaxed way.

“That sort of background information about Australian history and our indigenous history and multicultural history - all that sort of stuff of course people, you know, should be exposed to that and should have the opportunity to learn that. But that should happen in a relaxed environment where people don’t feel like they’re being assessed. You know, in that way, I think, encourage people to become active residents and active citizens in their new country,” said Gudkamp.

To gain Australian citizenship, candidates must answer from a random, computer-generated list of 20 questions.

There are sections on Australian values, religion, freedom of speech and gender equality.

Migrants must also pass an English language test. Critics believe this discriminates against people from non-English speaking backgrounds.

They have insisted the money would be better spent on language tuition for migrants.

The tests were part of a push by the former government of John Howard to promote Australian values after riots between Muslim and non-Muslim gangs at a Sydney beach in 2005.

Howard said the aim was to foster greater integration while still appreciating Australia’s rich ethnic diversity, where a quarter of the population was born overseas.

Failure to achieve the necessary standards in the citizenship test is not a major set-back for applicants.

They are allowed to re-take the examination as many times as they like.
By Phil Mercer
Sydney
02 January 2008

So much about immigration, legal or otherwise, is reported in the US as if it is only an issue here. There have been reports posted here about the topic from the UK point of view, this one about Australia as well as others. Immigration as a random solution for various problems ignores the need for orderly and sensible policies or laws. Not having a universally accepted opinion on the topic may be what drives the debate. It would appear that some believe everyone should be allowed to relocate any time, anywhere with little formality or requirements. Others have a more restrictive view. As usual the answer probably lies somewhere in between.

Stanford Matthews

China Says Bead Toy Contained Toxic Substance

Posted in Money Matters, Health, wordpress, disclosure, ethics, oversight, United States, China, Safety, Public, Foreign Affairs, Business, Australia on November 11th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

symbol

10 November 2007
Chinese made Bindeez (Australia) or Aqua Dots (U.S.) (File)China’s state-run news agency says the country’s quality control investigation has found a toxic substance was contained in Chinese-produced toy beads that harmed at least five children in Australia and the United States.

Xinhua reported Saturday that Chinese authorities have suspended the toymaker’s export license. It is believed all the beads were produced at the same factory in the southern city of Shenzen.

On Friday, China’s safety administration halted the export of the toy beads that had already been recalled in the United States, Australia and South Africa.

The toy beads were sold under the name Bindeez or Aqua Dots.

When swallowed, an adhesive coating on the beads reacts with digestive enzymes to make a powerful sedative that has caused unconsciousness, seizures or respiratory distress in several children. The children affected by the chemical have since recovered.

The toys were supposed to be covered by a harmless coating, but on some of the beads it appears that a toxic substance that metabolizes into a so-called date-rape drug known as GHB (gamma hydroxy butyrate) was used instead.

Moose Enterprises, the Chinese producer of the toy, says it now plans to coat the beads with a bitter tasting substance that will discourage kids from eating them.

The recalls are the latest in a series of problems that have seen 21 million Chinese-made toys pulled from store shelves world wide because of lead paint and other hazards.


from MoreWhat.com:
This is certainly getting a little old. Combined with food recalls, commercial pharmaceuticals and street drugs as well as obesity, health care issues and health in general, we may no longer have to concern ourselves with terrorism. We will be our own worst enemy.

UN Faults G4 on WTO Failures

Posted in Public Affairs, Money Matters, wordpress, Politics, U.N., United States, China, India, Agriculture, EU, Foreign Affairs, Business, Australia, Japan on July 3rd, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

crossposted at:
Reject the UN

It is not hard to believe that the only purpose of the UN is to provide a politically correct appearance for the selfish interests of all member nations. Nothing more than the same politically driven motives that smother any real progress on issues in the US Congress or similar government bodies in countries around the world. It is the international face of polarized agendas in every country on the planet.

A current example is the Doha round of trade negotiations of the WTO. You have the typical subgroups and silly names like the Group of Four (G4) and G10, Bulgaria, Iceland, Israel, Japan, Korea, Republic of Liechtenstein, Mauritius, Norway, Switzerland and Chinese Taipei, G6, G20, G33 and on it goes. The G4, the US, EU, India and Brazil as well as China are not interested in ending ag subsidies to protect their farmers. The 3rd world countries are interested in our markets as well as other industrialized countries and want to take advantage of their abilities to undercut the competition.

President Bush and President Putin had a meeting this week and it surely was not only about nukes and radar. President Bush’s ‘fast track’ trade authority expired at the end of June. That, together with all the aforementioned subgroups within the WTO and the failing Doha round and attempts to revive it by the APEC 21 nations meeting in Australia highlight the ‘my country first attitudes’ of so-called free trade agreements.

And of course the UN is involved.

WTO, UN chiefs say fate of billions hangs on global trade deal

Mon Jul 2, 1:25 PM ET

The heads of the United Nations and the World Trade Organisation on Monday both urged a successful conclusion to long-stalled global trade talks in order to lift billions of people out of poverty.

“The world desperately needs a successful conclusion to the Doha trade negotiations,” UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon told a meeting of the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) in Geneva.

“Existing trade barriers, agricultural subsidies, and restrictive rules on intellectual property rights reinforce global inequities — and they make a mockery of our tall claims to eliminate hunger and poverty from the world,” he said.

It is always done. Use concern over humanitarian interests to promote the selfish goals of member countries. And the other common characteristic is present in all conflicts between two or more adversaries. That is to focus your strategy against the largest or most successful competitors or opponents. The common theme in announcements about the trade talks focus on the G4 their protective policies against unfair trade practices of international competitors. Not a strategy that is lost on any other of the 150 member nations in the WTO. It is simply more common to attack the kings of the hill in seeking global sympathy for one’s mission or goals, right or wrong..

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Will Senator Harry Reid Cut and Run?

Posted in Israel, Bush, Terrorism, Lebanon, Hezbollah, Iraq, war, wordpress, Politics, Sean Hannity, Lieberman, Biden, McCain, Democrats, Rumsfeld, Tancredo, Religion, liberal, blog, News Media, Kennedy, Clinton, syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Osama bin Laden, Specter, North Korea, Nuke, U.N., United States, Russia, Britain, France, China, India, Iran, Hamas, Palestine, obama, hillary, kerry, romney, Freedom, Africa, Pelosi, Murtha, Hoyer, Reid, Edwards, Foreign Affairs, Byrd, Grassley, Congress, Silvestre Reyes, Islam, Muslim, Tony Blair, Abbas, Fatah, Hagel, Legislation, Military, Carl Levin, Putin, Mitch McConnell, Kim Jong il, Australia, durbin on February 24th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

Sen Harry Reid If the previous post does not show you that Senator Harry Reid is a contradction then understand he said they would not cut and run in Iraq or raise taxes. Right at the moment the tax thing is secondary. He said they would not cut and run. Senator Reid would you kindly explain the report below if you are not planning on cut and run?

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

US Senate Democrats Draft Plan to Revise Military’s Iraq Mission
By VOA News
23 February 2007

Democratic Party leaders in the U.S. Senate are working on legislation that would effectively revoke the 2002 resolution authorizing military action against Iraq.

Senate Democratic aides say the proposal, which is not expected to be adopted, would limit the U.S. military’s mission to training Iraqi troops and police forces, securing the country’s borders and combating terrorist forces. Regular combat forces would be withdrawn by next year.

The proposal, drafted by Senator Carl Levin, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, and Joseph Biden, who chairs the Foreign Relations panel is set to be presented to other Democratic senators next week.

If accepted, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would likely attach the proposal to an anti-terrorism bill. If passed by the Senate, which is not likely, the revised authorization would also have to be passed by the House and would be subject to a veto by President Bush.

Democrats and the independents aligned with them hold a slim 51 to 49 majority in the Senate, but hold a more comfortable majority in the House of Representatives.

The 2002 resolution gave President Bush authorization to take military action against Iraq, because of its alleged arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. In a speech last week, Biden said the original resolution is now irrelevant because the WMD program did not exist, and former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein is “no longer there.”

The bill is the latest effort by Senate Democrats to challenge President Bush on his Iraq policy. A vote on a non-binding resolution criticizing Mr. Bush’s plan to deploy an additional 21,000 troops to Iraq failed in the Senate, but was passed in the House last week.

Meanwhile, Democrats in the House of Representatives are considering a proposal by lawmaker Jack Murtha that would link funding of the U.S. military mission in Iraq to strict conditions on troop readiness and training standards.

Some information for this report was provided by AP and Reuters.

Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, The Right Nation, Leaning Straight Up, Maggie’s Notebook, and basil’s blog, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Obama Gets Down Under Politics

Posted in Terrorism, war, wordpress, Politics, campaign, election, Democrats, America, United States, obama, Foreign Affairs, Australia on February 13th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

Aussie Prime Minister Defends Obama Criticism

HowardJohn Howard tells Australia’s Parliament he was only concerned with Australia’s national interest, not U.S. politics, when he said Al Qaeda should be praying for a Democratic win in the U.S. presidential election next year.

Apparently by international standards, Obama’s star is shining so bright even Australia’s Prime Minister John Howard took notice. And someone may have invoked the race card. John Howard not only irked Obama but threw down on the Democratic party.


So John Howard makes a poiltical statement. Obama returns a political retort. So let the games begin. President Bush must be happy that one less person is ragging on him. So let’s not everybody make such a big deal of this. It’s politics. But one could make the argument with the storm of protest the Democratic party has helped stir up over the war in Iraq and related events, it will be hard for them to back off the “pacifist at all costs” strategy. It may have helped them win some votes in the midterms, but if they keep this charade up and get a President out of it we may be doomed to play appeaser politically, militarily, economically and socially. Then comrade, Putin will have the last laugh.
Putin said the US was making the world less safe, etc.,etc. Howard calls Obama and the Dems a benefit to Al-Qaida. Just in case you missed it these are foreign heads of state who have their own agendas. President Bush, Vladimir Putin, John Howard, Barack Obama and the Dems. Kinda sounds like a fairy tale doesn’t it? But that is beside the point. The US is making so much noise that some in the international community have decided to pile on or insert some strategy for their own benefit. Russia may be mad about losing bucks because of our intervention(s). Howard may not want us to quit the warring on terror because it saves him having to get involved. Politics international, national, state and local all cause more problems than they solve.

C. Harris
MoreWhat.com