Archive for the 'Freedom' Category

President Obama’s Islamic Transparency

Posted in Public Affairs, Terrorism, war, wordpress, Politics, Religion, America, obama, Freedom, Islam, Muslim on August 19th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

“As a citizen, and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country. And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances,” he said.

Another piece from Voice of America had this to say.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s support for an Islamic center to be built near the scene of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks has done little to mollify critics of the plan. However, it has strengthened the argument that it should be allowed in because of America’s tradition of religious freedom.

And this is what the Bill of Rights has to say about freedom of religion.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

No one is demanding a law about religion nor requesting that anyone not be allowed to practice their religion. But at the very least it is in bad taste to place a mosque in close proximity to the location where more than a dozen Muslims carried out the vicious murder of thousands of innocent victims.

Mr President, the flaw in your appeal to the Bill of Rights to defend what has been called an intentional provocation by certain Muslim individuals or groups obviously avoids the other side of the ‘rights’ equation. That is responsibility. When the rights of two or more persons clash a reasonable approach is needed to solve the problem.

Rather than pander to a special interest in direct opposition to the American traditions you cite as part of your argument you might consider calling them out on how they justify the description of a ‘religion of peace’?

Better yet, name one other religion that calls for the death of non-believers or infidels who do not convert to their religion. Name one other religion who has been responsible for as many deaths as Islam in the last 235 years. Name one other religion that calls for the destruction of an entire nation. Name one other religion having members who claim to denounce the radical elements within and do nothing to change it.

Could it be the quiet ones privately condone the violence of the religion of peace? Could it be their Jihad has its sights set on world domination? Could it be you will deny the threat of Islam until it is too late to respond?

Or are some of your critics right? You are just a Muslim at heart willing to aid the Jihad.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

MoreWhat Matters: Upbeat Conservative News

Posted in Public Affairs, Announcement, wordpress, Politics, conservative, News Media, Freedom on August 4th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

We the People

Highlighting some important issues is good even if politicians do it for the wrong reasons. It is up to the public to pressure their reps to do what is right. Some POLS are finally making statements about the need to examine anchor babies and other misuse of US immigration policy.

We need to remember people like Sheriff Joe are the good guys. Arpaio, Brewer and Pearce have started what needs to be done. While Clinton-nominated Judge Bolton slowed the progress of SB 1070 in Arizona there is reason to believe the fight has just begun in earnest and the will of the people will win as shamnesty advocates will be sent home in November 2010.

For instance, a recent report indicates Sharron Angle is once again gaining on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in Nevada. Opposition to incumbents across the nation indicates voter anger will clean house this fall.

Some of the stories below demonstrate the continued efforts to restore traditional principles and values to our great nation. Be part of the solution, not part of the problem.

Throw the bums out in November 2010, 2012 and repeat as necessary. Liberals and RINOs must go along with illegals. Do not tax our economy into oblivion. Eliminate debt and deficits by cutting entitlements and other waste. Stengthen national security and border control. Return to the founding principles and the rule of law.

Liberal agenda be damned. Restore America. Do the right thing.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

No new posts Leading Republicans Push 4 Review of Birthright Citizenship
No new posts Justice Gives Az. Sheriff Deadline in Rights Case
No new posts Mo. Voters Reject Key Provision of Health Care Law
No new posts Virginia AG Cuccinelli: Obamacare Ends Federalism
No new posts Wave of Health Reform Provisions Coming Next Month
No new posts Lieberman: ‘Put the Brakes’ Ground on Zero Mosque
No new posts Panel Frees Way for Ground Zero Mosque
No new posts Pelosi strikes confident note on midterms: ‘I’m not nervous
No new posts Kerry would reject a Petraeus request for more time, troops
No new posts Levin: Media too focused on negative….
No new posts Dem leaders, donors to hold Rangel birthday bash…
No new posts Agency Weighs Skirting Congress On Immigration
No new posts Gingrich: Obama Repeating Mistakes From the Great Depression
No new posts CBO Warns Obama: Exploding US Debt a Huge Risk

Declaration and Protest

Posted in wordpress, ethics, America, Freedom on July 25th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

In the meanwhile, we will breast with them, rather than separate from them, every misfortune, save that only of living under a government of unlimited powers. We owe every other sacrifice to ourselves, to our federal brethren, and to the world at large, to pursue with temper and perseverance the great experiment which shall prove that man is capable of living in society, governing itself by laws self-imposed, and securing to its members the enjoyment of life, liberty, property, and peace; and further to show, that even when the government of its choice shall manifest a tendency to degeneracy, we are not at once to despair but that the will and the watchfulness of its sounder parts will reform its aberrations, recall it to original and legitimate principles, and restrain it within the rightful limits of self-government.

Thomas Jefferson, December 1825

Draft Declaration and Protest of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on the Principles of the Constitution of the United States of America, and on the Violations of Them

from Rights and Responsibilities in America: Civics Literacy (14)

Ixquick Could Be the Real Deal

Posted in Public Affairs, Technology, wordpress, Politics, internet, disclosure, ethics, telecom, Freedom, EU on July 24th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

You might find this press release interesting. It also explains why the Ixquick logo and link are displayed prominently on this blog. Although this blog reserves the right to withdraw support for Ixquick in the future if circumstances warrant, much about Ixquck features a refreshing change from other search engines.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Ixquick: Search Engines Should Become Government Spies, Says EU Parliament
Ixquick and Startpage will fight “Big Brother” data retention clause in Declaration 29

June 28, 2010 03:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time

BRUSSELS & NEW YORK & ZEIST, Netherlands –(BUSINESS WIRE)–A draconian proposal to retain all Internet search traffic, known as “Written Declaration 29,” was adopted by the European Parliament last week. Framed as a measure to crack down on paedophiles, the controversial Declaration calls on the EU to require that search engines store all search traffic for up to two years for possible analysis by authorities.

Search engine Ixquick (www.ixquick.com), widely regarded as the world’s most private search engine, has built a strong privacy reputation by storing no search data on its users. The company believes it has been singled out by the data retention proposal, and it has vowed to strongly oppose the measure becoming law.

“Since Google, Yahoo, and Bing already retain users’ search data, this proposal is clearly aimed at Ixquick and our English-language subsidiary Startpage (www.startpage.com),” said Robert Beens, CEO of Ixquick. “We have worked hard to create a privacy-friendly search engine that embodies the spirit of EU Privacy Protections, in line with the strict recommendations of the EU Article 29 Data Protection Working Party. This Declaration is evidence that the left hand of the EU does not know what the right hand is doing.”

Mr. Beens fears that if the measure becomes law, it will vastly undermine the privacy of over 500 million law-abiding EU citizens. Storing everyone’s search data, rather than restricting surveillance to known or suspected offenders, would give the government access to a rich trove of political, medical, professional, and personal data on virtually every person in Europe. And critics say it will do little to stop child pornography.

“Sex offenders exchange files through underground networks. They don’t find this stuff through search engines,” said Alex Hanff of Privacy International, an advocacy group that is launching a campaign against the measure. “I spent eight years helping law enforcement track down online sex offenders and never once did we see a case where search engine data was useful.”

Ixquick will join the public campaign started by Privacy International to stop the provisions of Written Declaration 29 from becoming law.

“Privacy is a fundamental right and the basis of a free society. The phenomenal success of Ixquick and Startpage proves that people don’t want to be watched by their governments,” said Mr. Beens. “Spying on law-abiding citizens is not the way forward, and we will stand by our principles to protect the public’s ability to search in privacy.”

About Ixquick and Startpage

Ixquick is an international, award-winning search engine with an industry-leading privacy policy. Ixquick has been awarded the EU Privacy Seal by the independent certification authority Europrise. Further information can be found at www.ixquick.com and www.startpage.com.

For press inquiries, please contact:

EU Media Relations, Ixquick
Alex van Eesteren, +31-30-6971778
alex@ixquick.com

OR

U.S. Media Relations, Startpage
Dr. Katherine Albrecht
877-434-3100 (U.S. toll free)
+1-973-273-2125 (for International access)
kma@startpage.com

Human Rights vs Human Responsibility

Posted in Public Affairs, Terrorism, wordpress, Politics, Immigration, Tancredo, disclosure, ethics, United States, Law, Justice, obama, Freedom, Foreign Affairs, Border Control, Legislation, Mexico, ICE, Blogs4Borders on July 17th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

justice_is_blindHardly a day goes by without some ‘rights group’ being featured in the MSM. There are groups that could be defined as ‘responsibility groups’ but they receive little attention from those individuals that regard themselves as journalists or organizations that claim to present news and information based on standards of journalism.

Last week one report opened by describing Human Rights Watch as a ‘leading human rights group.’ Could the author be referring to the executive director’s salary? Since 1993 a lawyer named Kenneth Roth has been the executive director of HRW with an annual salary of $350,000. That’s nearly 18% of HRW’s management and general expenses for the year. And they may have 275 employees. And let’s not forget their fundraising expenses of $8,641,358 for 2008 (according to Wiki).

The non-governmental organization claims they do not accept government money directly. But they receive funds from other groups who may. And they supported ACORN at least in 2000 and/or 2001 to the tune of a half-million dollars.

So what’s this all about? The report out last week has Human Rights Watch whining about the rights of illegals. And for all their whining the problem they perceive could be solved if no one entered the United States illegally. They bad mouth countries all over the world for claimed wrongdoing. It is interesting that they say nothing about Mexico’s ‘responsibility’ to correct their own problems and eliminate the attraction to cross the border illegally into another country.

Here’s the report. Have a good laugh. HRW is a scam. The last three paragraphs assume the reader is extremely gullible. Correction, the entire report assumes you are gullible.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

from VOA News….

A leading human rights group is calling on the U.S. Congress and the Obama administration to include protections for immigrants’ rights in their proposals for immigration reform.

New York-based Human Rights Watch released a report Friday saying more needs to be done to protect undocumented immigrants in the workplace and in court.

The group says at work such people are vulnerable to exploitation - including sexual abuse and poor working conditions - and should be allowed to find other jobs in such cases.

It also recommends giving undocumented immigrants a path to legalization that includes government protection, so they feel safe to report crimes.

Earlier this month, President Obama called for bipartisan support for immigration reform. He described overhauling the system as a “moral imperative.” Congress is sharply divided over the issue, with Republicans generally opposing what they call amnesty programs.

The Human Rights Watch report also urges the government to allow immigration judges to consider the ties legal permanent residents have in the United States before deporting them for minor crimes. The group says thousands of legal residents are deported each year without having their family connections or past military service considered.

Human Rights Watch also calls on the government to limit immigrant detentions. The group says those who have committed nonviolent crimes should be exempt from detention.

MoreWhat Matters: Upbeat Conservative News

Posted in Public Affairs, wordpress, Politics, conservative, News Media, Freedom on July 13th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews
State Governors Face Fiscal Strain
Gibbs: Democrats Could Lose House
Debt Commission Leaders Paint Gloomy Picture
Kagan: Harvard Law’s $476 Million Dean
CNN Fires Middle Eastern Editor Over Tweet
Mideast Analyst Reilly: Radical Islamists Block Peace
GOP Newcomer Hot on the Heels of Feingold
Experts: ‘Ridiculous’ Lawsuit Won’t Nix Arizona Law on Illeg
Feds File Lawsuit Over Arizona Immigration Law
Ariz. Democrats Blast Obama’s Immigration Stance
Supreme Court vs. Obama: The Battle Lines Are Drawn
Arab Diplomat: Bombing Iran Has Benefits
Hawaii Gov. Vetoes Same-Sex Civil Unions Bill

Illegals Cost Billions

Posted in Public Affairs, Money Matters, Health, Education, Terrorism, wordpress, Politics, campaign, election, McCain, Immigration, Tancredo, disclosure, ethics, United States, Law, Justice, obama, Freedom, Pelosi, Reid, Arizona, Foreign Affairs, Congress, Border Control, Minimum Wage, Legislation, Mexico, Blogs4Borders, Jan Brewer on July 11th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

This is no surprise to anyone. Beyond the problem of national security, border control and ignoring the rule of law and founding principles of our nation illegal immigration is a crushing economic burden. It’s time for a reminder to all the liberals supporting shamnesty. Like the rest of the liberal agenda the notion of shamnesty is dangerous. An excerpt from a new report on the economic risks associated with illegal immigration is presented below followed by a link to the full report. Read it and weep, or join the fight against illegal immigration to save our country.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

The Fiscal Burden of Illegal Immigration on United States Taxpayers

Executive Summary

This report estimates the annual costs of illegal immigration at the federal, state and local level to be about $113 billion; nearly $29 billion at the federal level and $84.2 billion at the state and local level.

The full report (click here)

DeMint on Afghanistan, Spending, Immigration, & Tea Party

Posted in Public Affairs, Money Matters, wordpress, Politics, campaign, election, Immigration, ethics, Afghanistan, obama, Freedom, Sen Jim DeMint on July 7th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews


Like DeMint you can pass by the Steele problem as it is merely a distraction. There are many reasons why ousting Democrats this November is important. Not the least of which is the Obama Administration’s decision to sue over Arizona defending its borders since the Obamanation will not. The other items mentioned in the title are equally important.

But the overall consideration is to return this beloved nation back to its founding principles and only conservatives seem interested in that goal. And be clear. Candidates like Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina are not conservatives. Fiorina destroyed HP. Fiorina is an establishment Republican who is in lock step with RINO McCain. Whitman is in the news for two things recently. Her support from other billionaires and shamnesty. Like Bloomberg and Murdoch as well as other limousine liberals they claim conservative values while eroding the rule of law and support liberal fantasies that are dangerous.

Find real conservatives to support and get them in office. Our nation needs them. Let’s move the country in the right direction after years of neglect.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Immigration, Obama and Election Year Politics

Posted in Public Affairs, Terrorism, wordpress, Politics, Immigration, Tancredo, disclosure, ethics, United States, Law, Justice, obama, Freedom, Border Control, Legislation, Blogs4Borders on July 6th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

The previous post touched on President Obama’s recent immigration speech. Reviewing the speech once again compels commentary. The first excerpt to be evaluated demonstrates that Mr Obama can present inspirational messages.

I was a candidate for President that day, and some may recall I argued that our country had reached a tipping point; that after years in which we had deferred our most pressing problems, and too often yielded to the politics of the moment, we now faced a choice: We could squarely confront our challenges with honesty and determination, or we could consign ourselves and our children to a future less prosperous and less secure.

That IS the speechmaking undoubtedly responsible for many casting a ballot for then candidate Barack Obama. But as Mr Barone pointed out in his writing at the Washington Examiner referenced in the previous post this particular immigration speech was all about election year politics. The very plague that then candidate Obama denounced to get elected.

It gets worse.

I believed that then and I believe it now. And that’s why, even as we’ve tackled the most severe economic crisis since the Great Depression, even as we’ve wound down the war in Iraq and refocused our efforts in Afghanistan, my administration has refused to ignore some of the fundamental challenges facing this generation.

Sorry Mr President, you have not ‘tackled’ the economic problems. And you and your liberal followers used anti-war rhetoric, campaigning and personal attacks on the very man you now hail as the best choice to lead the military operations in Afghanistan, General Petraeus. In addition you and your crew have refused to acknowledge the success of the surge in Iraq for allowing the winding down in Iraq. Your senate leader Harry Reid went so far as to say the war was lost.

But you are correct on the last point. Your administration has refused to ignore ’some’ of the challenges. Those items you choose to target are for purposes of your liberal agenda. The items you mention in this speech: the economy, healthcare, Wall Street, energy and immigration are all targets of your liberal agenda and your attention to them has nothing to do with ‘confronting the great challenges of our times’.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Protecting the 4th of July

Posted in Public Affairs, wordpress, America, United States, Freedom on July 4th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

There is no real need to publish a post encouraging Americans to celebrate the birth of our nation. As is the case with this and other official holidays in this country the public interest in exploiting ‘free’ time for leisure activities is self-sustaining. What does need to be addressed and encouraged is the underlying importance of the Fourth of July in the United States.

The passing of time and the fading memories of current events and issues in the public mindset serves to demonstrate that much older historical facts and events regardless of their importance are lost in our daily lives. This condition poses a danger that we may find ourselves at risk of losing what is represented by this very day. Freedom, independence and all the other benefits of living in this great country were of course provided by the discipline, commitment and sacrifice of those who came before us as well as many who currently carry on that tradition on our behalf.

This is still a very young nation. That most of us have enjoyed the liberty we celebrate does not guarantee its survival. The words used above, discipline, commitment and sacrifice describe what is required to protect this nation. Just as we all share in the benefit of being Americans we all have a responsibility to honor those who gave us this legacy by sharing the burden and adhering to the principles that have guided this nation for more than two centuries.

We are by no means perfect. We have differences which cause disagreement and have been responsible for some of the darker moments in our history. It is the founding of this nation, the wisdom of the founding fathers, the documents that provide our road map and the ability to return to these principles when we stray that have allowed our survival as a free people. No matter the circumstance let us all do our part for this great country.

God bless America.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

(this is a repost from 2009)

Rights and Responsibilities in America: Civics Literacy (14)

Posted in Public Affairs, Education, wordpress, America, United States, Freedom on July 3rd, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

WeThePeopleGOV.jpg

It is long overdue that this blog features a post on ‘Rights and Responsibilities in America: Civics Literacy.’ That this is the point on the calendar in which patriotic Americans turn their attention nationwide to the founding of our nation is certainly an opportunity to correct this oversight. This blog is dedicated to America and preserving our nation but this one post series has been recently neglected and for that the blog author, Stanford Matthews, apologizes.

The content featured for this installment of ‘Rights and Responsibilities in America: Civics Literacy’ will not be accompanied by any point, opinion or argument from the blog author. The item from Thomas Jefferson obviously stands on its own. And it is for you to decide what special significance, if any, it holds for you this Independence Day weekend, 2010.

There are additional copies of other founding documents in the ‘pages’ portion of the sidebar. Feel free to browse.

God bless America.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Jefferson, Thomas, 1743-1826. Public Papers

Draft Declaration and Protest of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on the Principles of the Constitution of the United States of America, and on the Violations of Them

December 1825

We, the General Assembly of Virginia, on behalf, and in the name of the people thereof, do declare as follows:

The States in North America which confederated to establish their independence of the government of Great Britain, of which Virginia was one, became, on that acquisition, free and independent States, and as such, authorized to constitute governments, each for itself, in such form as it thought best.

They entered into a compact, (which is called the Constitution of the United States of America,) by which they agreed to unite in a single government as to their relations with each other, and with foreign nations, and as to certain other articles particularly specified. They retained at the same time, each to itself, the other rights of independent government, comprehending mainly their domestic interests.

For the administration of their federal branch, they agreed to appoint, in conjunction, a distinct set of functionaries, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the manner settled in that compact: while to each, severally, and of course, remained its original right of appointing, each for itself, a separate set of functionaries, legislative, executive, and judiciary, also, for administering the domestic branch of their respective governments.

These two sets of officers, each independent of the other, constitute thus a whole of government, for each State separately; the powers ascribed to the one, as specifically made federal, exercised over the whole, the residuary powers, retained to the other, exercisable exclusively over its particular State, foreign herein, each to the others, as they were before the original compact.

To this construction of government and distribution of its powers, the Commonwealth of Virginia does religiously and affectionately adhere, opposing, with equal fidelity and firmness, the usurpation of either set of functionaries on the rightful powers of the other.

But the federal branch has assumed in some cases, and claimed in others, a right of enlarging its own powers by constructions, inferences, and indefinite deductions from those directly given, which this assembly does declare to be usurpations of the powers retained to the independent branches, mere interpolations into the compact, and direct infractions of it.

They claim, for example, and have commenced the exercise of a right to construct roads, open canals, and effect other internal improvements within the territories and jurisdictions exclusively belonging to the several States, which this assembly does declare has not been given to that branch by the constitutional compact, but remains to each State among its domestic and unalienated powers, exercisable within itself and by its domestic authorities alone.

This assembly does further disavow and declare to be most false and unfounded, the doctrine that the compact, in authorizing its federal branch to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States, has given them thereby a power to do whatever they may think, or pretend, would promote the general welfare, which construction would make that, of itself, a complete government, without limitation of powers; but that the plain sense and obvious meaning were, that they might levy the taxes necessary to provide for the general welfare, by the various acts of power therein specified and delegated to them, and by no others.

Nor is it admitted, as has been said, that the people of these States, by not investing their federal branch with all the means of bettering their condition, have denied to themselves any which may effect that purpose; since, in the distribution of these means they have given to that branch those which belong to its department, and to the States have reserved separately the residue which belong to them separately. And thus by the organization of the two branches taken together, have completely secured the first object of human association, the full improvement of their condition, and reserved to themselves all the faculties of multiplying their own blessings.

Whilst the General Assembly thus declares the rights retained by the States, rights which they have never yielded, and which this State will never voluntarily yield, they do not mean to raise the banner of disaffection, or of separation from their sister States, co-parties with themselves to this compact. They know and value too highly the blessings of their Union as to foreign nations and questions arising among themselves, to consider every infraction as to be met by actual resistance. They respect too affectionately the opinions of those possessing the same rights under the same instrument, to make every difference of construction a ground of immediate rupture. They would, indeed, consider such a rupture as among the greatest calamities which could befall them; but not the greatest. There is yet one greater, submission to a government of unlimited powers. It is only when the hope of avoiding this shall become absolutely desperate, that further forebearance could not be indulged. Should a majority of the co-parties, therefore, contrary to the expectation and hope of this assembly, prefer, at this time, acquiescence in these assumptions of power by the federal member of the government, we will be patient and suffer much, under the confidence that time, ere it be too late, will prove to them also the bitter consequences in which that usurpation will involve us all. In the meanwhile, we will breast with them, rather than separate from them, every misfortune, save that only of living under a government of unlimited powers. We owe every other sacrifice to ourselves, to our federal brethren, and to the world at large, to pursue with temper and perseverance the great experiment which shall prove that man is capable of living in society, governing itself by laws self-imposed, and securing to its members the enjoyment of life, liberty, property, and peace; and further to show, that even when the government of its choice shall manifest a tendency to degeneracy, we are not at once to despair but that the will and the watchfulness of its sounder parts will reform its aberrations, recall it to original and legitimate principles, and restrain it within the rightful limits of self-government. And these are the objects of this Declaration and Protest.

Supposing then, that it might be for the good of the whole, as some of its co-States seem to think, that the power of making roads and canals should be added to those directly given to the federal branch, as more likely to be systematically and beneficially directed, than by the independent action of the several States, this commonwealth, from respect to these opinions, and a desire of conciliation with its co-States, will consent, in concurrence with them, to make this addition, provided it be done regularly by an amendment of the compact, in the way established by that instrument, and provided also, it be sufficiently guarded against abuses, compromises, and corrupt practices, not only of possible, but of probable occurrence.

And as a further pledge of the sincere and cordial attachment of this commonwealth to the union of the whole, so far as has been consented to by the compact called “The Constitution of the United States of America,” (constructed according to the plain and ordinary meaning of its language, to the common intendment of the time, and of those who framed it;) to give also to all parties and authorities, time for reflection and for consideration, whether, under a temperate view of the possible consequences, and especially of the constant obstructions which an equivocal majority must ever expect to meet, they will still prefer the assumption of this power rather than its acceptance from the free will of their constituents; and to preserve peace in the meanwhile, we proceed to make it the duty of our citizens, until the legislature shall otherwise and ultimately decide, to acquiesce under those acts of the federal branch of our government which we have declared to be usurpations, and against which, in point of right, we do protest as null and void, and never to be quoted as precedents of right.

We therefore do enact, and be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia, that all citizens of this commonwealth, and persons and authorities within the same, shall pay full obedience at all times to the acts which may be passed by the Congress of the United States, the object of which shall be the construction of post roads, making canals of navigation, and maintaining the same in any part of the United States, in like manner as if said acts were, totidem verbis, passed by the legislature of this commonwealth.

source

American Voices

Posted in Public Affairs, wordpress, Politics, News Media, America, Law, Justice, Freedom on June 22nd, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

WeThePeopleGOV.jpg

For one who is as willing as the next person to criticize the mainstream media for their biased reporting I am just as willing to credit those presenting a fair representation of the facts. The first obligation for this post is to give credit where credit is due.

Pauline Arrillaga is a national writer for The Associated Press, based in Phoenix.

Arrillaga has the byline for the report quoted and linked to in this post. It is the best article this blogger has seen to date in the MSM dealing with the tea party phenomenon and the underlying cause and widespread reason for its development as well as the growing voice of ordinary Americans not associated with any tea party organization.

For those expressing opposition to the liberal agenda in this country whether tea party members or not a single quote from the article sums up the general flavor of patriotic concerns.

Its stated purpose is “to promote, educate and advance conservative principles of fiscal responsibility, small limited government, free enterprise, the rule of law, private property rights, and the preservation and protection of individual liberty.”

That Arrillaga’s report goes out of its way to disspell the notion there is something wrong with tea parties or angry voters is the single most refreshing MSM account to come along in years. Discussing what some of the people chronicled face while engaging the process gets to the heart of the matter.

These four were all in Searchlight that Saturday in March. They’ve heard, time and again, the characterizations in the news media, from some Democrats and, in certain cases, from their own friends and relatives — about how “those tea party-ers” are just angry voters venting about economic hard times, or they’re confused, uneducated and easily influenced, or they’re extremists, or, worst of all, they’re racists.

Months after Searchlight and other rallies, plenty of questions remain about just what the tea party is, whether it can endure and how much influence it will have on elections this year and in years to come. Part of the answer is this: In communities across the land, citizens-turned-activists are digging in in different ways to wield whatever power and influence they’re able to muster over this thing called democracy.

To hear what motivates them is to begin to understand what’s going on in American politics in 2010.

Really, in America itself.

That’s what I’m talking about! What’s going on in America? Those who are represented by elected officials have finally had enough of politics as usual. It has been time for change for many years. But the ‘hope and change’ offered by the liberal agenda is not what most of us had in mind.

The brief list offered near the top of this post more accurately describes what is needed. ‘fiscal responsibility, small limited government, free enterprise, the rule of law, private property rights, and the preservation and protection of individual liberty.’

Let’s not forget to emphasize the US Constitution and our nation’s founding principles.

Thanks to Pauline Arrillaga at AP. Thanks to the folks described in the report. And thanks to all Americans who echo the sentiment presented here. Carry on and repair our nation. Protect her from those who would do her harm. Stand up. Stand on principle.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

June 6, 1944

Posted in Public Affairs, Announcement, war, wordpress, United States, Freedom, Military on June 6th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

D-Day Memories from the US Army
Ordinary people who accomplished an extraordinary feat to save the world from tyranny. The lessons taught by the actions of these remarkable individuals stand as testimony to what becomes necessary when the world ignores the threats to peace and liberty. To honor their service and sacrifice let us not allow this to happen again. You can watch a short video by clicking on the picture above as well as explore other features which commemorate this day in history.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

1st Amendment, JC, Comedy Central and Slippery Slopes

Posted in wordpress, Religion, America, Hol_ywood, Freedom, Entertainment on June 6th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

A press release dated May 6 from Comedy Central network describes their 2010-2011 development slate.

Puppet cops, 80’s hair bands, Jesus Christ, a modern day take on “The Odd Couple,” race relations, office politics in Deep Space and a live sex show. These ideas and many, many more make up COMEDY CENTRAL’s 2010-2011 development slate announced today by Kent Alterman, head of original programming and production, COMEDY CENTRAL.

Described below is one of the projects.

“JC”

A half-hour animated show about JC (Jesus Christ) wanting to escape his father’s enormous shadow and to live life in NYC as a regular guy. A lot has changed in 2000 years and he is the ultimate fish out of water. Meanwhile his all-powerful yet apathetic father would rather be playing video games than listening to JC recount his life in the city. JC is a playful take on religion and society with a sprinkle of dumb. Executive produced by Reveille (”The Office”), Henrik Basin, Brian Boyle (”American Dad”), Jonathan Sjoberg and Andreas Ohman.

So far, news of this one particular program has resulted in this.

Comedy Central chided for proposed Jesus cartoon
AP Thu Jun 3, 6:46 pm ET

NEW YORK – A coalition of religious and conservative leaders is trying to stop a proposed Comedy Central cartoon that puts Jesus Christ in a modern-day context — before it even gets started.

The newly formed Citizens Against Religious Bigotry said Thursday that it believes the “JC” series would be offensive. They accuse Comedy Central of a double standard in mocking Christian figures and beliefs while recently refusing to let “South Park” depict the Prophet Muhammad for fear of offending Muslims.

The second paragraph above certainly appears to be a fair criticism.

Like it or not, if you believe in freedom of speech and expression you will not always be in agreement with the speech or expressions of others. At any point in time the restriction or expansion of freedom is an endless process. The difficulty in preserving freedom and liberty will always generate disagreement. How we deal with that will determine whether or not we remain free.

The view from this blog finds a more troubling concept than Comedy Central’s contrast in positions with regard to Christians and Muslims. That concept is hate speech and the development of criminal penalties for someone’s idea of what that is. There’s a slippery slope.

Here’s something worse than the slippery slope.

Groups want FCC to police hate speech on talk radio, cable news networks
06/01/10

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is being urged to monitor “hate speech” on talk radio and cable broadcast networks.

A coalition of more than 30 organizations argue in a letter to the FCC that the Internet has made it harder for the public to separate the facts from bigotry masquerading as news.

The groups also charge that syndicated radio and cable television programs “masquerading as news” use hate as a profit model.

Liberals have frequently referred to President George W Bush as a Nazi yet contend that ’syndicated radio and cable television programs’…. ‘use hate’.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

President Obama’s Memorial Vacation

Posted in Bush, wordpress, America, obama, Freedom, Military on May 27th, 2010 by Stanford Matthews

There are those who support President Barack Obama. There are those who do not support President Barack Obama. Most of us are familiar with the arguments for either choice. And there are certain instances where Americans are accustomed to and expect an American President to respond in a particular fashion. Especially when that response deals with honoring core values and principles that are the bedrock of our nation’s founding.

One such core value and principle is honoring fallen heroes and those who serve. Each year Memorial Day of course is one such instance where a particular presidential response is expected. The President’s attendance at Memorial Day ceremonies is a ‘given’ for most people.

Absent-in-Chief: Obama MIA for Memorial Day, Vacationing as Spill Worsens
Wednesday, 26 May 2010 12:58 PM

Already under increasing fire for his handling of an oil spill that many experts now say will be the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history, President Barack Obama is riling conservatives and veterans with his decision to skip the traditional Memorial Day ceremonies at Arlington National Cemetery.

Instead, he will vacation in Chicago.

The decision not only has angered conservative pundits such as Glenn Beck but also has riled military families and others who expect the president to follow tradition on the day reserved for honoring the sacrifice of America’s soldiers.

The following information is presented for all those willing to give President Obama a pass on this one and especially for all the Bush bashers including the current White House and liberals in general.

President George W Bush was in office for eight years. President George W Bush honored Memorial Day each of those eight years as Presidents should.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

GWmemorialWreath2008whGov400.jpg

(above)
President George W. Bush, accompanied by Major General Richard J. Rowe Jr., commander of the Military District of Washington, foreground left, lays a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknowns Monday, May 26, 2008, during a Memorial Day ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, VA. White House photo by Shealah Craighead
May 2008
President Bush Attends Arlington National Cemetery Memorial Day Commemoration

caption:
President George W. Bush is joined by Major General Guy Swan III, left, commander of the Military District of Washington, during the Memorial Day commemoration wreath laying ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknowns Monday, May 28, 2007, at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, VA. White House photo by Shealah Craighead

caption:
President George W. Bush delivers remarks on Memorial Day at the amphitheatre in Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Va., Monday, May 29, 2006. White House photo by Shealah Craighead

May 2005
President Commemorates Memorial Day at Arlington National Cemetery

caption
President George W. Bush stands at attention during Wreath Laying ceremonies in commemoration of Memorial Day at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia Monday May 31, 2004.

President Bush Honors the Brave and Fallen Defenders of Freedom
Arlington National Cemetery
Arlington, Virginia
May 2003

President Bush Commemorates Memorial Day at Normandy
May 2002

Home > News & Policies > May 2001
caption:
The President and Laura Bush pause before the laying of the wreath at Arlington National Cemetery on Memorial Day, Monday, May 28.
WHITE HOUSE PHOTO BY SUSAN STERNER