Archive for the 'Markey' Category

A Look at Rep Roscoe Bartlett

Posted in Money Matters, wordpress, Politics, GOP, Democrats, Gore, Markey, Environment, Military, Ike Skelton, Rep Roscoe Bartlett on May 12th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

Rep Barlett of Maryland is so excited about this you would think he was a freshman. But then he had help with this insanity from Markey and Skelton, both Democrats. Of course they would help you with this, they are Democrats and their god who invented the internet has declared with all his scientific wisdom that his version of global warming is the right one.

Rep Roscoe BartlettRep Edward MarkeyRep Ike SkeltonPork

At least this saves time for this blog. We usually find single references to an individual politician behaving badly. This is a three for one deal. The really sad part is this may be the only example of both parties working together this year. (besides screwing us on immigration) And in reality it is probably one minority party member being had by two majority party members. Ok, the really sad thing is the three of them caused a problem for all of us. Spending money on one more unproven adventure into the current global warming craze. How about we get something resembling consensus in the public at large before we go off half-cocked spending additional public funds.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Defense Bill Could Mandate a Report on Climate Change

Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD 6)
May 11th, 2007
The House Armed Services Committee included a requirement for an assessment of the impact of climate change on current and future Department of Defense missions as part of H.R. 1585, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008. The Defense Authorization bill was approved by a unanimous vote of 58-0.

110th Congress: 2007 January Report

Posted in Uncategorized, Public Affairs, Money Matters, Technology, Health, Education, Bush, Terrorism, war, wordpress, Politics, campaign, election, Lieberman, Biden, McCain, GOP, Democrats, Immigration, Tancredo, blogroll, conservative, liberal, internet, blog, conspiracy, Kennedy, Kyl, Waxman, sodrel, lobbyist, disclosure, ethics, oversight, Specter, Justice, Video, Public, COPE Act, Net Neutrality, telecom, Markey, Sensenbrenner, obama, hillary, kerry, Opinion, Jeff Flake, Cheney, Medicare, Murtha, Hoyer, Reid, Gabrielle Giffords, Foreign Affairs, Dingell, Conyers, Byrd, Grassley, Congress, Silvestre Reyes, Border Control, Minimum Wage, Stem Cell Research, Hagel, Legislation, Military, Senator Enzi, David Obey, James Oberstar on February 5th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

The HouseSo how did the United States Congress do in the first month of the 110th session? You be the judge. First, a little review of the fact that posts here have sometimes asked why we get so focused on what Congress does. After all, they legislate. That’s it. They legislate. The can pass laws. Whatever the House passes must be passed in the Senate also. So both Houses of Congress must pass the same version of a bill before it can become law. Then it goes to the President. He can sign it into law. He can veto it and send it back to Congress. He can pocket-veto at the end of the session. Or he can pretty much ignore it and it becomes law. All you expert legal types out there, feel free to refute this if you must.

Next, Congressional action is either a bill or resolution. Most of the time, resolutions are pretty much useless to the ordinary citizen. There is one example this past month that is not useless. It should not have to come to this but usually does. A joint resolution is similar to a bill. The one last month was for appropriations. You know, to keep the government operating until Congress and the President figure out what they’re doing.

Party AnimalsSo six bills and one joint resolution have the term “on passage” next to them in the voting record in the House. Being that it is joint and includes the Senate, that’s the only thing showing up on their completed list. Then there are the six bills. You’ll remember them from the daily reminder of the 100 hour agenda. Here’s a take on that.

On January 9, 2007, House of Representatives 1 or HR1 was passed.
This is to implement 9/11 Commission items.

On January 10, 2007, HR2 was passed.
This is for increasing minimum wage over 26 months.

On January 11, 2007, HR3 was passed.
This is to “enhance” stem cell research.

On January 12, 2007, HR4 was passed.
This allows government to negotiate medicare drug prices.

On January 17, 2007, HR5 was passed.
This lowers interest rates on government backed student loans

On January 18, 2007, HR6 was passed.
This is an act for alternative energy creation. That’s quite an act.

On January 19, 2007, HR475 was passed to revise the House Page Board.

The above items are what the House passed. The Senate passed the one joint resolution with the House. And one item became law that was posted here earlier. It is for renaming a National Recreation Area.

The SenateOne law was passed to rename a park. And the other bills have many hurdles to cross before they can become law. Even if they become law there is no guarantee they will have any positive effects. No one, with any regularity, will follow up on them. So the Congress has done nothing for one month. They have solved nothing. There is only one item as law and it is not critical. 21 Senators are worried about 2008 due to re-election. Other Senators are worried about running for President. And the rest have passed one joint resolution and participated in renaming a park.

We would be better off paying more attention to the remainder of government. At the federal level at least, nothing productive is happening in the legislative branch. Ask anyone from the House or Senate if they care to dispute this. The new Democratic majority are developing disharmony among themselves as are the GOP members. If any of you still hold out optimism for the 110th Congress, good for you. Currently, the chances of Congress contributing to the overall good of the country are slim. That is unless they change their ways. And they will not.
Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Check the Beltway Traffic JamĀ 

While Democrats Celebrate

Posted in Public Affairs, Israel, Bush, Terrorism, Lebanon, Hezbollah, Iraq, war, Politics, Sean Hannity, campaign, election, Lieberman, Biden, McCain, GOP, Democrats, Hurricane Katrina, Rumsfeld, Gore, Immigration, Tancredo, Pombo, Religion, conservative, liberal, internet, conspiracy, News Media, governor, oil, Kennedy, Kyl, Lamont, syria, Rush Limbaugh, Frist, Waxman, sodrel, lobbyist, disclosure, ethics, oversight, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Osama bin Laden, Specter, America, Randy Graf, North Korea, Nuke, U.N., United States, Russia, Britain, France, China, India, Iran, Law, Justice, Hol_ywood, Hamas, Palestine, Public, Markey, Sensenbrenner, obama, hillary, kerry, romney, Dixie Chicks, Freedom, Opinion, Negroponte, Africa, Cheney, Medicare on November 10th, 2006 by Stanford Matthews

Felipe_calderon_1.jpg

Bush, Mexico’s Calderon to work on immigration
Reuters -
… W. Bush and Mexican President-elect Felipe Calderon
pledged on Thursday to work together for a comprehensive
solution to curb illegal immigration from Mexico …



If it was not a plot by both Houses of Congress to introduce
HR4437 knowing it would never get through the Senate, then
the fine new Senate of the 110th Congress should be able to
finish strong reform starting in January 2007. Similar to the
fact that Immigration Reform of 1986 was never enforced, in
their grand wisdom, politicians have improved on their deceit
by creating a better strategy. Work together just long enough
to satisfy mutual goals and fool the public in believing you really
give a damn. Like Democrats conceding Presidential 2004
elections by nominating John Kerry when John Edwards wsa a
much more viable candidate. Kerry was a sacrificial lamb and
the only one who did not know it was Kerry. He still doesn’t.

We hope all you smiling Democrats are enjoying your victories.
We hope all you Republicans are understanding your arrogance
that led to this. And we hope you both as well as all of America
is prepared for a continuation of porous borders, unrestricted
immigration and a complete breakdown of national security.

If you haven’t noticed, the resignation of Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld and previously mentioned items absolutely elated the
Muslim world. Al-Jazeera and the rest have been celebrating
since November 7th, 2006. Thank you one and all. NOT!

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Net Neutrality & the COPE Act (Part 2)

Posted in Announcement, Tancredo, internet, conspiracy, News Media, disclosure, ethics, oversight, COPE Act, Net Neutrality, Markey, Sensenbrenner on October 27th, 2006 by Stanford Matthews

Big Biz Loves When You Do Nothing

COPE Act, Net Neutrality & the Telecom Industry It is likely in your own best interest to pay attention to this legislation and help defeat it in the Senate since it has a version that passed the House. The roll call voting results will be provided in a subsequent post this week.
Stanford Harris
MoreWhat.com staff

First paragraph of the CRS Summary of HR 5252, as amended and passed on June 8, 2006 by the House.
H.R.5252 (with blogger comments in red text)

Title: To promote the deployment of broadband networks and services.


The bill was introduced on May 1, 2006 and passed on June 8, 2006. Can you say fast track? When do you remember Congress ever moving a piece of legislation this fast before? If Congress is in a hurry, it is not usually a good thing for the public. Since they are regularly blamed for not getting things done, when they are moving fast it should be a red flag that something isn’t right.



Communications Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement Act of 2006 - Title I: National Cable Franchising - (Sec. 101) Amends the Communications Act of 1934 to allow an eligible person or group (cable operator) to obtain a national franchise to provide cable service in a franchise area in lieu of any other authority under federal, state, or local law for the provision of cable service in that franchise area. Requires an interested cable operator to file with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) a certification containing specified information, including an identification of each franchise area for which the operator seeks to offer cable service. Makes granted franchises effective for ten-year periods, with automatic renewal unless revoked by the FCC for willful or repeated violations of laws, false statements, or material omissions. Permits a franchise authority to file a petition with the FCC to terminate the national franchise of a cable operator that was already providing cable service and then obtained a national franchise if such national franchisee becomes the only cable operator in the franchise area.

In the paragraph above, the third line, the phrase in bold type, if that is not enough to make you wonder what is going on here, then you don’t want to see it.