Archive for the 'Russia' Category

Obama Risk of the Year Pic

Posted in Public Affairs, Terrorism, war, wordpress, Politics, Nuke, United States, Russia, obama, Freedom, Foreign Affairs, Medvedev on August 9th, 2009 by Stanford Matthews

Obama, Medvedev bilateral meeting April 2009
(President Barack Obama meets with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev during their bilateral meeting at Winfield House in London, Wednesday, April 1, 2009. White House Photo/Pete Souza)

At two recent congressional hearings, U.S. diplomats, defense and military officials outlined how the Obama administration intends to go about “resetting” the U.S. relationship with Russia. Lawmakers on the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs, and Armed Services committees asked some tough questions about key aspects of the U.S-Russian relationship.

If you are not concerned about President Obama and discussions with President Medvedev of Russia you should be. White the ‘beer summit’ of Obama and Biden is surely not the ‘test’ VPOTUS forecasted in months past, negotiations between the Eagle and the Bear may be.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

MoreWhat Matters: Alternate View of Obama

Posted in Public Affairs, wordpress, Politics, youtube, Russia, Video, obama on July 24th, 2009 by Stanford Matthews


If you are tired of ABC, CBS, NBC, etc.,etc, watch this video take on Obama

Obama’s Risky No Nukes Policy

Posted in Public Affairs, wordpress, Politics, Pakistan, North Korea, Nuke, United States, Russia, Britain, France, China, India, Iran, obama, Foreign Affairs on July 7th, 2009 by Stanford Matthews

During the 2008 US Presidential election campaign many noticed the personal history of candidate Barack Obama appeared cloaked in secrecy as little was uncovered about his earlier days growing up or attending college and the candidate was not offering any clarity on the topic. Surprisingly, the NY Times is offering an account of at least one aspect of student Obama’s thinking on nuclear arms. And Jennifer Rubin offers a report expanding on the concerns that President Obama may still hold these youthful idealistic notions. Unfortunately, Mr Obama may be operating without benefit of the practical realities that typically guide world leaders through the dangerous territory of foreign affairs.

Kennedy, KruschevThe student was Barack Obama, and he was clearly trying to sort out his thoughts. In the conclusion, he denounced “the twisted logic of which we are a part today” and praised student efforts to realize “the possibility of a decent world.” But his article, “Breaking the War Mentality,” which only recently has been rediscovered, said little about how to achieve the utopian dream.

Twenty-six years later, the author, in his new job as president of the United States, has begun pushing for new global rules, treaties and alliances that he insists can establish a nuclear-free world.

With Iran, North Korea and surely others pursuing nuclear weapons arsenals and Russian leaders expressing concern over US missile defense proposals leading up to current arms negotiations the Obama mindset may be of concern to you. Especially if the new President has an obsession with youthful idealism.

Obama Has Gotten It Wrong for Twenty-Five Years

Jennifer Rubin - 07.05.2009 - 8:31 AM

Those who suspect the president is engaged in a bit of dangerous self-delusion and denial about certain unpleasant realities regarding the threats from rogue states won’t be heartened to read that his current non-proliferation fetish stems, at least according to the New York Times, from his college infatuation with the nuclear freeze movement.

The line below from the Rubin piece should feature prominently with any US position on arms negotiations.

ReaganAnd really, what excuse is there for Obama’s ludicrous worldview? Unlike student Obama, President Obama knows how the Cold War ended. And it wasn’t by disarming America.

The impotent ‘international community’ has done nothing to stop rogue states from pursuing an arms race in a time ideally suited for such a collective effort. That alone should raise suspicion about the intentions of those courting the US on disarmament. Other recent reports are offered below.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Russia Still Opposes US Plan for Missile Shield in Eastern Europe

Russia Wants Deeper Cuts in Numbers of Nuclear Warheads

Next Round of US-Russian Arms Talks Set for June 23

Russia Ready to Reduce Nuclear Arms

Russia, US Begin Talks Over New Arms Control Pact

Russia, US Work on New Missile Pact

Are U.S.-Russian Relations Warming?

Clinton, Russian FM Agree to Improve US-Russian Relations

Resurgent Russia Poses Challenge for Obama Administration

US Leadership: Paint the Picture, Drop the Ball

Posted in Public Affairs, Money Matters, Israel, Terrorism, wordpress, Politics, North Korea, U.N., United States, Russia, China, Iran, obama, GM, Ford, Chrysler, Foreign Affairs, Congress on June 15th, 2009 by Stanford Matthews

principles
From the White House website and the out of place blog three items are featured. Health care reform is touted as ‘the key to our fiscal future.’ The 2000th transportation construction job located in Michigan is described so cutely as the road to recovery. And ‘a broad array of ways’ the public can participate in government extends the fantasy of transparency and accountability, etc.

And a list along side these items outlines legislation passed this year. The measure on credit card rules demonstrates the not so creative use of words to give the impression new laws are significant. Accountability (there’s that word again), responsibility and disclosure are combined with credit or card to give the cute acronym CARD for this law. Another weapons procurement law, another title suggesting a way to save homes of those at risk of foreclosure, something on fraud and recovery, serving America, managing public lands, extending some small business programs, PORKULUS, DTV and SCHIPS finish out the list with a bill characterized as securing fair pay.

You can conclude that all these things guarantee the spending of more taxpayer dollars. What you cannot conclude is whether or not they will do any good. Every time Congress passes a law and the President signs it money will be spent. But exactly what good it does or the fact that no one in Washington (or really at any other level of government) will do anything to present facts and figures with supporting data to prove the end results or lack of same stands as evidence nothing changes in the executive and legislative branches at the federal level and all talk of transparency and accountability is ludicrous.

Put this in comparison with the biggest issues this past week. North Korea has expanded on its course to collide with the rest of the world on nuclear threats and its reckless actions while the best the White House can do is say it supports the UN resolution that is simply one more impotent act in a series of them from the international community including current leadership of the United States.

Iran is reported to have held elections in which the little Hitler has been kept in power while the opposition is making claims of election fraud. Has anyone offered a helping hand to those making the allegations in an effort to place pressure on Iran to show proof of a valid election? If the world’s rogue state’s can refuse to recognize Israel why can’t the same be said of Iran based on this week’s elections?

A Treasury Dept task force ‘defends’ taking over the automobile industry There is some quiet noise being made about Gitmo and Uighur detainees and China’s opposition to relocating them from members of Congress. Obama plans to push another government takeover in the form of health care reform. The House of Representatives passes a State Dept funding plan to clean up other people’s messes and waste more taxpayer money. But let’s keep accepting the White House PR that progress is being made and things are going to get better. Cuz there from the government and here to help. Right.

It might be fair to say that Russia an China, being two other significant players on the world scene, are doing just as poorly as the US leadership in turning things around and getting serious about what really matters. But this blog is not that concerned about how well other countries are living up to their responsibilities. The US needs its leadership to return to principles that have kept us going all these years. Tearing down what has been and ‘rebuilding the fundamental ways’ this country functions as Obama has suggested is not a recipe for success.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Russia and Iraq May Revive Pre-War Contracts

Posted in Iraq, wordpress, United States, Russia, France, Germany on April 11th, 2009 by Stanford Matthews

10 April 2009

Russia and Iraq have agreed to work toward restoring contracts established before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Russian Energy Minister Sergei Shmatko said the understanding was reached during Friday’s talks in Moscow between prime ministers of the two countries.

Russian energy firms such as Lukoil signed agreements with the government of Saddam Hussein. But Saddam later canceled Lukoil’s deal to develop Iraq’s West Qurna oil field, and other contracts were frozen after the 2003 U.S. invasion.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and his Russian counterpart discussed improving cooperation on the oil and gas industries and other subjects.

Russian state media, Itar-Tass, quoted Mr. Maliki as saying that Russian companies will play an important role in Iraq’s reconstruction.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin told reporters that his country and Iraq will likely resume cooperation in the area of military technology.

Mr. Maliki met later Friday with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev during his first official visit to Russia.

Iraq’s foreign minister signed an agreement last year to repay about $900 million in Soviet-era debt over 17 years. Russia agreed to forgive nearly $13 billion as part of the deal.

from MoreWhat.com:

Does anyone remember that Russia, France and Germany were among the loudest opposition to military force against Saddam Hussein at the UN before the war? One theory was the trio worried about lost revenue for contracts they had with Iraq at the time. Coming full circle it would appear.

Stanford Matthews

Mr President: Think Cold War II (test to follow)

Posted in Israel, Terrorism, wordpress, Religion, Pakistan, United States, Russia, Britain, France, China, India, Foreign Affairs, Islam, Muslim, Military on April 7th, 2009 by Stanford Matthews

crossposted to:
Maggie’s Notebook
Conservative Thoughts

This month President Barack Obama caused the eyes of many to glaze over with his wandering message expressing an interest in a world free of nuclear weapons. Those who applauded the announcement were from one of three groups. Those who share membership in the not so exclusive nuclear club of planet Earth or wannabees who are delighted the new American President will try to disarm the US. Or uber liberals with reality issues who still believe surrender and appeasement will bring peace to the world. Or really nice folks who thought it impolite not to applaud the person on stage accepting blame for everything on behalf of the country he represents.

Yo Barry. Here’s a heads up for you. Most people accept the events in history that led to the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, China and France being the original, and for a time only, members of the group known as the Nuclear Club. Well, except maybe for France, but that’s another story. They’re the same ones who support the US strategy in Afghanistan but won’t send troops or ones that can fight. Oh ya, and they’re the ones like some others in the EU who support the G20 idea of providing a trillion in stimulus but are fine with the US contributing more than their share. And apparently, Mr Obama, you agree.

In addition to the original members of the Nuclear Club are India and Pakistan. Just like Iran and North Korea now, no one had a clue how to prevent these two countries from joining. And there are about a dozen other countries included in discussions of who has the ability to go nuclear. (Israel’s ability is assumed but not declared ) So the number is at or approaching a couple of dozen. Are you following this so far, Mr President?

If you understand the previous few paragraphs then why the hell are you making these public statements about a nuclear free world? This is one time most Americans would hope you are offering another promise you will break. Otherwise one can only assume the pressure is getting to you and you’re losing it. If the problem was so simple to solve and all the people of the planet could get along as you and your followers believe, don’t you expect it would have been achieved by now? Has it ever occurred to you that the reason the problem has not been corrected is that no one has the answer yet? It is fair to assume that what was once feared as the ultimate fate of a nuclear armed Earth still remains.

But a likely alternative expectation, given the UN’s typical failure to respond to the DPRK’s missile launch, is that with proper handling avoiding catastrophe can be achieved in much the same way as it was in the past. All parties will be attracted to their nuclear power of choice while the nuke powers will maintain a balance still based on mutual assured destruction if the worst would happen. At some point thereafter this game will be exhausted and other circumstances yet to arrive will cause nations of the world to abandon this stupidity. Not because we will then be wiser but some other equally scary threat will require extraordinary cooperation between all the people on this planet in order to survive. And no, Mr Gore, it’s not Global Scamming Warming. It’s those peaceful Muslims carrying suitcases. (hint, hint)

We may then have a taste of peace long enough to become addicted to its benefits. But it won’t happen due to some idealistic fantasy that we can all get along because that is the way ti is supposed to be. That may come within time but for now you are trying to put the cart before the horse at best or transforming the human race to an endangered species at worst. Starting with the United States for whom you took an oath. It may be time for you to read it again for the first time.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

What IS for Sale at the G20?

Posted in Money Matters, wordpress, United States, Russia, Britain, France, China, obama, Foreign Affairs, Japan, Germany, Gordon Brown on April 2nd, 2009 by Stanford Matthews

If the reports below are any indication of what can be expected from the G20 summit in London this week anyone skeptical of good news resulting will not be disappointed. It is likely the optimistic expectations suggested by President Obama of the US and Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Britain will not come to fruition.
what's for sale?
Apparently those in charge of releasing a collective statement for leaders in attendance are having difficulty deciding what to say. After embarrassing leaks and reports of numerous revisions this may demonstrate the feeble performance yet to appear from the world’s, ah hem, leaders.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

The Times understands that the money will come in three separate packages.

The first are new lines of credt worth more than $100 billion to encourage countries to trade more.

The second is a possible tripling to $750 billion in the resources held by the International Monetary Fund to rescue struggling economies. The extra money will come from Japan, the EU, China and others.

The third is a one-off allocation of “special drawing rights” that enable countries to swap their own currencies for IMF backed resources.The effect is to give those countries more confidence to deplete their reserves and expand.

The report above is from the Times and the one below from the Telegraph (UK)

A version that surfaced in Germany last week appeared to show that leaders are still not agreeing on what to say about “fiscal stimulus” measures to boost economic activity by borrowing.

British officials have insisted that that the German leak was out of date and failed to reflect the intense negotiations carried out by “sherpas” and other officials ahead of the actual summit.

In fact, the text being circulated in London today commits leaders only to make “the scale of sustained effort necessary to restore growth” and contains no detail about the size and type of stimulus countries should undertake.

For a little entertainment you may wish to follow the link from the excerpt below.

The G20 protests

Wagging the dog

Apr 2nd 2009
From Economist.com
On the barricades and behind the cameras in London

OUR day of covering the protests starts with a failure: the Whitechapel Anarchist Group, whom we had emailed about interviewing, fail to answer their phone (too busy preparing to spread mayhem if other press reports are to be believed, though their blog huffily decries these accounts). At 7am, the City is quiet. Work traffic is light for a weekday, and my camera-wielding colleague and I are keen to get shots of the City prepared for protests, so set off looking for banks and offices that have shut for the day. HBOS and Halifax both sport locked doors, but security guards prevent us from filming. Frustrated, we head toward London Bridge where one of the marches is due to start.

Seriously: “Send in the Clowns” on Queenzbop playlist (Michelle Malkin)

No reset for Secretary of Overcharge

Posted in Public Affairs, wordpress, Politics, Democrats, liberal, Clinton, United States, Russia, obama, hillary, Foreign Affairs on March 7th, 2009 by Stanford Matthews

Delegating tasks is one thing but would someone please explain how it would not be entirely Hillary Rodham Clinton’s fault for dropping the ball on this one? A US Secretary of State tries to be cute and offer the Russian Foreign Minister a gift featuring one word in Russian and gets it wrong. Another fine example that the Obama Administration is amateur hour.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

No reset for Hillary‘Reset Button’

Vice President Joe Biden said last month that it was time for the two countries to hit the “reset button” in their relations, a phrase often repeated since. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev likewise said he was “reassured” by the positive signals coming from Washington since Barack Obama’s victory.

Clinton played on Biden’s phrase for photographers at the beginning of her meeting with Lavrov, handing him a green-wrapped box complete with bow and containing a mock “reset” button.

The two laughed as Lavrov explained that the mistranslated Russian word on the button didn’t say “reset,” as intended, but rather “overcharge.”

“We won’t let you do that to us,” Clinton said in response, before getting more serious. “We mean it and we look forward to it.”

Lavrov smiled and thanked her.

“We’re going to push the reset button of constructive cooperation,” Lavrov told reporters after the meeting.

Obama Offers Russia Secret Deal

Posted in Public Affairs, wordpress, Politics, conspiracy, News Media, Clinton, United States, Russia, obama, hillary, Foreign Affairs, Medvedev on March 4th, 2009 by Stanford Matthews

For those who continue to offer their unconditional support for President Obama’s Administration another report indicates public opposition for his policies and the suggestion he embraces appeasement as well as other dangerous strategies in both his foreign and domestic agendas are anchored in fact. Understandably Russia has been puffing up their chest lately as the anxiety of a diminished role in international affairs and the lesser ability to influence outcomes since the demise of the Soviet Union in the eighties and nineties takes its toll. Rather than incorporate these conditions into foreign policy of strength there is evidence the Obama Administration once again prefers the path of appeasement in an attempt to resolve other issues. In other words, we will abandon the missile defense program in Europe if you help foil Iran’s plans for a nuclear weapon.

Russia maintains no such agreement is in the works. Obama and his crew publicly suggest missile defense may not be necessary if Russia helps out. Any way you slice it there is every reason to conclude these political statements are simply that and Obama is fully invested in appeasement. It is another way of saying we won’t challenge you if you won’t hurt us. How is that going to improve national security? The sad truth is it won’t. Just see how it worked for Neville Chamberlain.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com
the fall of the Berlin wall
In Moscow, Medvedev spokeswoman Nataliya Timakova said that Obama’s letter contained various proposals and assessments, but offered no quid pro quo.

“Obama’s letter contained various proposals and assessments of the current situation,” she said . “But the message did not contain any specific proposals or mutually binding initiatives.”

She further disclosed that Obama’s letter was in response to one from Medvedev and that the Kremlin appreciated the “positive” spirit of Obama’s message.

not in this caseWASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama has written to his Russian counterpart suggesting U.S. plans for a missile defense system in Eastern Europe might be unnecessary if Moscow helped in blocking Iran’s progress toward building long-range missiles, senior administration officials said on Tuesday.

Plans for deploying U.S. missile defenses in Poland and the Czech Republic, ostensibly to guard against Iranian attacks on U.S. allies in Europe, are among a host of issues that soured U.S.-Russia relations during the former Bush administration. There have been indications Obama, who has vowed to shake up American foreign policy, might be willing to set aside the missile defense system.

“President Obama sent a letter to Medvedev that covered a broad range of issues, including missile defense and how it relates to the Iranian threat,” one senior administration official said on condition of anonymity to discuss private communications of the president.

“The suggestion is that need for missile defense deployment could become unnecessary if, working together with Russia, the Iran missile threat is addressed,” the official told The Associated Press.

Obama Offers Russia Secret Missile Defense Deal
By VOA News
03 March 2009

Senior officials in the Obama administration say President Barack Obama has offered Russia a deal involving a controversial plan by the U.S. to deploy a missile defense system.

The officials say Mr. Obama made the offer in a letter delivered early last month to his Russian counterpart, Dmitri Medvedev.

In the letter, the U.S. president offers to reconsider plans to deploy a missile defense system in Eastern Europe, in exchange for Moscow’s help to stop Iran from developing long-range weapons. Russia has developed economic and military ties with Tehran, and has resisted the hardline U.S. stance against Iran.

Clinton, ObamaRussia has yet to respond to Washington’s overtures. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov will discuss missile defense with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when they meet Saturday in Geneva.

Presidents Obama and Medvedev will meet in London April 2.

The missile defense plan angered Moscow when it was proposed by the Bush administration. Former President George W. Bush wanted the defense system, saying it was needed to deter Iran in case Tehran developed a nuclear warhead to fit on long-range missiles.

The Bush administration’s plans included building a high-tech radar facility in the Czech Republic, and deploying 10 interceptor missiles in Poland - two nations that Russia once considered within its “sphere of influence.” Mr. Bush rebuffed a Russian counter-proposal to install part of the system on its territory and jointly operate it.

Vice President Joe Biden has used the colloquial phrase “press the reset button” to describe the Obama administration’s goal of reviving and renewing Washington’s relations with Russia.

No Signs of Gas Dispute Ending Between Russia, Ukraine

Posted in Money Matters, wordpress, Politics, Russia, EU, Business, Energy on January 11th, 2009 by Stanford Matthews

global energyThe report below may make disputes between energy suppliers in the US and their customers seem less of a critical issue. What initially seemed to be a hardline dispute over the negotiation of pricing contracts between the former Soviet Union and the Ukraine has accusations of theft. So the EU is getting no gas from Russia until the Ukraine proves it is not stealing gas? That’s a controversy you wouldn’t want to be on the short end with the Russians in the middle of winter. It puts one at a considerable negotiating disadvantage. Sucks to be them.

If memory serves this is not the first time a problem like this has emerged among the same parties. One would think you might want to have other options for delivery for your gas supplies to avoid being held hostage by a disagreement. And the one thing Americans should understand is our well known reliance on foreign energy supplies puts us in a situation not so different from this. If it is fuel for your transportation that is one thing. If it heats your home in the middle of winter it takes on a whole new significance.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com



10 January 2009

Deliveries of Russian gas to Europe remain suspended after negotiations on Friday aimed at agreeing on a mechanism to monitor gas flow through Ukraine failed to bring any result. Russian state-run energy firm Gasprom, which has pledged to resume deliveries to Europe once the deal is signed, has said Ukraine disrupted Friday’s talks. Kyiv, meanwhile, is saying that Ukraine is prepared to sign a deal on a monitoring mechanism as soon as possible.

Millions of Europeans are left shivering in some of the coldest temperatures of the winter so far, as Russia, which supplies one-quarter of all gas consumed in European Union countries, continues to halt deliveries of its gas.

New Russia or old SovietMoscow cut its supplies to Ukraine on January first following a price dispute and on Wednesday, it also stopped all shipments to Europe through pipelines running across Ukraine, accusing Ukrainian authorities of stealing gas.

The Ukrainian president Victor Yushchenko strongly denied Russia’s charges strongly denied Russia’s charges and said that Ukraine did not steal one cubic meter of Russian gas.

European gas line monitors arrived in Kyiv on Friday morning. Filip Cornelis, who head of group said, “The purpose of our monitoring mission is to verify on an independent basis the flows of gas coming into the Ukrainian system and be able to compare them on an independent basis with the precise flows of gas that reach the European customers with whom Gazprom has commercial contracts.”

Russia pledged to resume the pipeline delivery of Russian gas across the territory of Ukraine after independent monitors are installed. Gazprom’s CEO Alexei Miller pledged Gazprom would resume shipments to Europe once the monitoring teams deploy to pipeline-pumping stations across Ukraine.

Now Russian President Dmitri Medvedev insists that they could not proceed until Moscow and Kyiv sign a protocol on how the mission will operate. Negotiations on developing such mechanism failed on Friday.

President Medvedev said Moscow had no trust left in the good intentions of the Ukrainian side and that Russia will act only after the documents are signed.

Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek, whose country holds the rotating EU presidency, is in Moscow meeting with Russian leaders Saturday after overseeing Friday’s negotiations in Kyiv.

Moscow wants Ukraine to pay the full market price for gas without the discount Ukraine has enjoyed since the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. But Ukraine, which is struggling through economic crisis, says Russia wants double what Ukraine is prepared to pay. Moscow’s last offer was 250 U.S. dollars for a cubic meter of gas, but Gazprom said the offer no longer stands after Ukraine rejected it and that it will charge Ukraine $450.

EU authorities have warned that even after Moscow resumes gas shipments, it will take at least three days before the deliveries reach all EU member countries.

Sarkozy Trying to Put France Back on the Map

Posted in wordpress, U.N., Russia, France, India, Iran, Africa, EU, Foreign Affairs, Mexico, Sarkozy on September 25th, 2008 by Stanford Matthews

Sarkozy and Bruni's Secret Marriage Trip
This picture of Nicolas Sarkozy and Carla Bruni could work for a caption contest. Lookin’ a little saggy there Nick, is the better half giving you the ‘what for’ starting on your wedding day? Wuz up, Nick, is she suggesting a beach diet? Gotta have some fun with a country’s leader when they marry a high profile celeb, current creds subject to debate, and then lectures the world on finance, Africa and who should or shouldn’t be subjected to the humiliating experience of membership in the UN.

But you have to give Sarkozy some credit. He’s done more to raise France’s reputation in the world since being elected than, uh, since, uh, I dunno, Napolean? Suggesting Marie Antoinette might be tasteless, but she was given a bad rap by the MSM or something.

Can’t be helped. On this blog any opportunity to exploit Carla Bruni at France’s expense is just too hard to resist.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

France Calls for Global Summit on Financial Crisis

23 September 2008
French President Nicolas Sarkozy has called for an emergency summit of world leaders to address what he calls the most serious financial crisis the world has experienced since the 1930s.

In a speech at the U.N. General Assembly Tuesday, Mr. Sarkozy said the international community has a political and moral responsibility to deal with the effects of such crises. He said world leaders should act now to create globalized institutions that will regulate financial activity and rebuild a system of capitalism where rules of caution apply to all.

Mr. Sarkozy, whose country holds the rotating EU presidency, also called for solidarity between Europe and Russia. He said Europe wants a partnership with Russia, but he warned that Moscow must not compromise respect for international law or territorial sovereignty.

Mr. Sarkozy mediated a truce ending last month’s conflict between Russia and Georgia for control of Georgia’s breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

On Iran, the French leader said Europe respects Tehran’s right to peaceful nuclear activity. But he said it cannot accept a nuclear-armed Iran that would endanger the peace and stability of the entire region.

Turning to Africa, Mr. Sarkozy said the world cannot wait to achieve peace and end the “tragedy” in Sudan’s western Darfur region. He said Europe also is committed to helping Somalia combat piracy off its coasts.

Mr. Sarkozy said Europe is working to ensure Africa has a place among the permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, and in what is currently the Group of Eight (G8) industrialized nations.

The French president called for enlarging the U.N. Security Council and the G8 in an effort to make the institutions more representative. He said the world can wait no longer to bring India, South Africa, Mexico and Brazil into the fold of international institutions.
Some information for this report was provided by AP.

The Russian Bear

Posted in Bush, wordpress, Politics, oil, Nuke, United States, Russia, EU, Foreign Affairs, Putin, Medvedev on September 21st, 2008 by Stanford Matthews

The approach of the general election featuring the selection of a new President in the United States has seen an incredible amount of turmoil surrounding the current political season. The war on terror while producing success such as the troop surge in Iraq has fallen on the deaf ears and blind eyes of the Democratic party as they criticize the party occupying the White House in the form of President Bush and also offer no congratulations that the US has suffered no further attacks on American soil during his watch. Struggles in the financial sector are also blamed solely on the President and his party by the members of the political opposition.

issues that matterThese situations are not an entirely American ordeal of course as the leaders of Russia in the form of Vladamir Putin and Dmitri Medvedev are experiencing similar controversy. The report below may suggest a change in tone from the Kremlin although recent events are more reminiscent of the Cold War than not. Two Russian Tu-160 bombers left Venezuela this week after conducting air patrol flights in the region. They may return in November for a joint exercise that hasn’t been seen since the Cold War that Putin claims he doesn’t want to be ‘dragged into with the West.’

Just like in the old days of the Cold War, Russia flexed its muscle in a small way with the Tupolev jets but in a more symbolic but provocative way with its nearly simultaneous testing of a new ICBM. The Bulava carries six warheads and can travel 10,000 km. Not surprisingly the Russian media expressed the missiles ability to penetrate any future missile shield. A statement likely directed against the US plans to install missile shields in Poland or elsewhere to protect allies from the likes of Iran or other ‘rogue’ nations bent on expanding their influence through terrorist actions.

The apparent change in tone from Mr Putin was not likely in response to European Union members limp challenge to Russia’s thumping of nearby Georgia. After ruling out sanctions, the EU held a meeting and then condemned Russia for the move. Do you suppose they are somewhat timid due to Russia’s control over so much of their oil supply?

Almost mirroring US financial sector woes Russian President Medvedev blamed the move on Georgia as risking the orderly flow of business in the financial markets of Russia. More turmoil and upheaval in Russia may be faced by the ‘privileged class‘ with ties to the West, international finance centers and of all things NATO complicating their agenda. It may be difficult to tell if the Georgian conflict and repercussions from it were responsible for the need to prop up their markets with this week’s 20 billion cash infusion or if Russia was simply experiencing the same problems the rest of the world was.

Perhaps after some time to digest current events and take the world’s temperature, Putin took a different approach to public affairs in the report below. Just like the financial woes in the US and elsewhere, politicians may be making too much of it too soon. If in six months we’re hearing no more of it the proof that most of the talk was purely political will be obvious. Just as obvious as the players doing nothing to prevent future problems and that they were just being politicians.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Putin Rejects Cold War, Backs Economic Integration


Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin says his nation is seeking full integration into the world economy and will not be dragged into another Cold War era with theputin West.

Mr. Putin was speaking to Russian officials and business leaders in the Black Sea resort of Sochi.

On Thursday, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Russia is becoming “increasingly authoritarian” and “aggressive.” At an event hosted by the German Marshall fund, Rice delivered her strongest comments to date about Russia’s invasion of Georgia and other recent actions.

She said the U.S. goal is to make clear to Russia’s leaders that their choices are putting Russia, in her words, “on a one-way path to self-imposed isolation and international irrelevance.”

She said that for Russia to reach its full potential, it must be fully integrated into the international political and economic order. She said Russia is in the “precarious position of being half in and half out.”

In Moscow, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev said Thursday that relations with the United States remain a priority for Russia. He said it would be politically short-sighted to squander the achievements and potential in relations by reviving stereotypes of the past.

Some information for this report was provided by AFP and Reuters.

Russian President Medvedev Exclusive Video Interview

Posted in wordpress, Politics, youtube, News Media, Russia, Video, Foreign Affairs, Medvedev on August 26th, 2008 by Stanford Matthews

Medvedev`s exclusive interview with RT
(on recognizing independence of the Georgian rebel regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia)

Medvedev Interview with Russia Today

Russia Recognizes Independence of Breakaway Georgian Republics


26 August 2008
Fedynsky report - Download (MP3) audio clip
Fedynsky report - Listen (MP3) audio clip

Russian President Dmitri Medvedev has signed decrees granting formal recognition to the Georgian breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. But VOA Moscow correspondent Peter Fedynsky reports analysts say the move could promote separatism in Russia itself.

President Medvedev announced Russian recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in a five-minute nationally-televised address, in which he accused Georgia of an attempted blitzkrieg aimed at eliminating the people of the breakaway republics.

The Kremlin leader says he has signed decrees regarding the Russian Federation’s recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. He says Russia calls on other states to follow his country’s example. Mr. Medvedev says the decision is not easy, but it offers the only possibility to save people’s lives.

He says recognition is based on the desire of the Ossetian and Abkhaz peoples for independence, as well as United Nations Charter, a 1970 declaration on international law, and the Helsinki Agreement.

Independent Russian political analyst Alexander Konovalov told VOA the decision weakens the Helsinki Agreement, a document that has recognized the inviolability of Europe’s post-War boundaries since it was signed in 1975. Konovalov says this will hurt Russia itself, because Moscow will no longer be able to oppose U.S. and Western recognition of Kosovo, a province that broke lose of Serbia, a Russian ally.

Russia Georgia South Ossetia Abkhazia

The analyst says even more importantly for Russia, recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia plants a time bomb in the Caucasus, because if Moscow acknowledges the right of Ossetians and Abkhaz to secede from Georgia, why can’t the Ingush and Chechens leave Russia? He says he does not know how or when the time bomb will go off, but he is certain that it will.

Chechens fought two very bloody wars of independence with Russia in recent years, which ended only after one of the warring clans turned their guns against other Chechens to side with the Russians who put them in charge of the restive region. Chechens have been fighting Russian rule since the 19th century and the area is still considered a hot bed of independence.

The chairman of the European Integration Forum in Tbilisi, Soso Tsiskarishvili, told VOA that Mr. Medvedev’s decision is likely to raise ethnic awareness and stoke separatism throughout Russia. He says Mr. Medvedev’s decision to recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia demonstrates that he is a short-sighted leader, who was selected, not elected, and cannot be trusted to honor Russia’s solemn international commitments. Tsiskarishvili is also critical of Georgian leadership, saying it runs the risk of losing domestic political support.

Tsiskarishvili says he is not convinced there is sufficient confidence among the people of Georgia in the ability of current authorities to control the situation in the long run, or that they will be able to remain real players on Georgia’s political scene.

Tsiskarishvili says that if any Georgian leader still harbors ideas of continued fighting over South Ossetia, it will mean the loss of virtually any possibility of maintaining the country’s territorial integrity.

Celebrity Crusaders

Posted in Public Affairs, wordpress, U.N., Russia, Music, Opinion on August 18th, 2008 by Stanford Matthews

Russian Pop Star Battles Human Trafficking



Schlein report - Download (MP3) audio clip
Schlein report - Listen (MP3) audio clip

Russian Pop diva Valeriya is using her star appeal and personal experience as an abused woman to help migrant workers in her homeland break free of the bonds of sexual exploitation and forced labor. The Geneva-based International Organization for Migration has named Valeriya as its goodwill envoy for the Russian Federation. She says she will use this position to try to prevent migrants from becoming victims of human trafficking. Lisa Schlein reports for VOA from IOM headquarters in Geneva.

ValeriyaRussian pop star Valeriya is wildly popular at home and in neighboring countries. She has sold 100 million CDs. She hopes to break into the British music market, where she has been dubbed the Russian Madonna, with an English version of her album Out of Control.

But, all is not as wonderful as this dazzling success would imply. Valeriya is the first one to acknowledge that appearances can be deceptive.

“I consider myself as an ex-victim of slavery,” she said. “I have suffered a lot from domestic violence for 10 years. I was forced to work for a man, who was my husband, and treated me - he treated me like his own slave.”

Her words are at odds with the poised, pretty woman saying them. She does not look like a victim. Tall, thin and elegant, Valeriya looks much younger than her 40 years. Her publicity photos exploit her sexy blonde good looks. In person, however, she appears simpler and more fragile. Her boyish haircut, loose bangs and big blue eyes belie the suffering she says she had to endure during 10 years of marriage.

“My husband was a real monster,” she said. “I did not know it before, but he beat me up. He cut me with knives and sexual exploitations - well, all kind of these bad things. So, I know how it is. It is not easy to talk about it.”

Valeriya’s husband was also her manager. She says he forced her to sign many contracts so she could not work without his permission. She says he took all her money. Finally, she says she got fed up with this abuse, took her three children and ran away to a small town where her parents lived.

“Six of us lived in their small one-bedroom flat for two years, and I was a very famous singer at that moment,” she said. “But, for me it did not matter, anything. I just wanted to be free.”

Valeriya believes she can draw upon her own experience as goodwill envoy for the International Organization for Migration to help people in danger of becoming victims of human trafficking.

Human trafficking frequently involves the trafficking of women and children for sexual exploitation. It also often involves exploitation of agricultural and sweatshop workers, as well as individuals working as domestic servants.

Since 1992, IOM reports about one-half million women left Russia in search of work in neighboring countries. It says many of them ended up being trafficked.

IOM’s chief of mission in the Russian Federation, Enrico Ponziani, says, when people arrive in the country of destination, their passports and travel documents are taken away. They are confined in places where they have no freedom of movement.

“And, then, at that point, they have become basically slaves,” he said. “They are fed when the trafficker wants to feed them, and then they have to do everything that they are told to do.”

Ponziani says this form of modern day slavery does not just apply to sexual exploitation. It also takes the form of forced labor, where people do not get paid for the work they do.

“They are forced to do what they are told,” he said. “And, if not, they are threatened, beaten; in the case of women, [they are] raped, etc., etc …Trafficking is both. It touches men, women, children, everybody.”

Some 260 victims of trafficking have been helped at an IOM rehabilitation center, which opened in Moscow in 2006. Many are Russians, followed by migrants from Uzbekistan, Moldova and Ukraine.

IOM’s head of counter-trafficking activities worldwide, Richard Danziger, says it is impossible to get exact numbers of victims who have been trafficked, but he is sure that the 260 known victims in Moscow are just the tip of the iceberg.

He says there has been a major change in trafficking trends. Russia is no longer a major source country.

“Russia has become a major destination country,” Danziger said. “Because of the boom in the Russian economy, it is attracting migrants from all the neighboring countries. Certainly women, but also men.”

Valeriya says she will always retain some wounds from her abusive life with her husband. But, she says she is using her experience to tell other women who have suffered badly not to feel sorry for themselves, but to act to rebuild their lives, as she has done.

from MoreWhat.com:

Why do those who reach some degree of celebrity in the entertainment business or elsewhere feel compelled to launch some sort of campaign on behalf of whom ever? Madonna did. Is that why some refer to Valeriya as the Russian Madonna? Bono did or does. Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt do. What’s the deal? Is it a way to get over their guilt of success and having whatever they want? Is it a way to get more publicity?

Stanford Matthews

Russia Begins Delivering Fuel to Iranian Nuclear Power Plant

Posted in wordpress, News Media, Nuke, Russia, Iran, Foreign Affairs on December 17th, 2007 by Stanford Matthews

iran nukes
The Russian state agency building Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power station has made its first shipment of fuel to the facility.

Atomstroiexport issued a statement Monday announcing the delivery to Bushehr - Iran’s first nuclear power plant.

Russia’s foreign ministry said Monday that the fuel will be under the control and guarantees of the International Atomic Energy Agency for the whole time it is in Iranian territory.

Tehran argues that nuclear work at Bushehr and elsewhere is strictly for civilian purposes. But the United States and its Western allies have accused Iran of using the programs as a cover to develop nuclear weapons.

An Israeli delegation is in the United States in an effort to convince U.S. officials that Iran is still developing nuclear weapons — despite a recent U.S. intelligence report that said Tehran stopped its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

The report also said Iran continues to enrich uranium and would have enough for a nuclear weapon sometime between 2010 and 2015.

Enriching uranium is a process that can produce fuel for nuclear weapons.

By VOA News