China, Russia Act as Weak as Obama on Nuclear Iran

BEIJING (Reuters) - China urged other powers on Tuesday to show more flexibility in dealing with Iran’s disputed nuclear programme, playing down prospects of sanctions after six countries met to discuss the standoff.

While Western powers have looked to further sanctions against Iran over its rejection of a U.N. plan to rein in Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, Russia and now especially China have resisted such steps and called for more negotiations.

How about this for a conspiracy theory? China and Russia have ties with Iran. They could care less if the US or its allies view Iranian nukes as a problem. China is hell bent on being a dominate force on the planet and has achieved much in that regard. Russia has lamented the fall of the Soviet Union since it happened and Putin is determined to regain that status as a world power.

Imagine Russia wants to relive the Missiles of October scenario from 1962 and allow Iran to be their proxy and provoke a nuclear standoff or worse, launch a strike against Israel? Israel may well be able to react in advance and preempt a first strike. Add to that any reaction that would come from China and others with nuke capability and Armageddon is poised to occur as the end of the Mayan calendar approaches in 2012. Coincidentally, the year President Obama is up for re-election and the VPOTUS warning of a test shows up late.

Even without the conspiracy theory, the so-called international community continues its impotent policy toward the current nuclear threat.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

4 Responses to “China, Russia Act as Weak as Obama on Nuclear Iran”

  1. Maggie M. Thornton Says:

    Stanford, I don’t think this is a conspiracy theory. I think it is fact. Russia and China are already in the deep doo-doo with Iran. They are not threatened. They do not care that we are threatened. In fact, it’s a plan. We basically committed suicide when we allowed China and Russia onto the Security Council as permanent members. Now Iran has two rogue nations to watch their back.

  2. Stanford Matthews Says:

    I don\’t really view my little scenario as a conspiracy theory. But I thought a little, shall we say, tongue in cheek demeanor was fitting. My underlying theme here is as follows.

    Some say current liberalism is vastly different from the philosophy\’s roots. 150 or 200 years ago, liberal was a reasonable set of principles. Again, some say it is quite similar to libertarian now. The problem is most countries in the world minus the theocracies subscribe to political notions like socialism. As Hannity often recites, from each according to their ability, to each according to their need. Which really is more like Marxism or communism. Point being, Russia, China, the EU and others seem to favor that brand of \’ism\’.

    Obama, Dems, liberals and all who follow seem quite content with that. The growing swell of public outrage in America and a resurgence of conservative thought and principles is all that stands between us and a socialist world.

    Those are the thoughts that gave rise to this post. I challenge any reader to present a rebuttal.

    Thanks for stoppin\’ in Maggie and the comment. God bless America and go Favre!! (don\’t want to get too serious, or maybe I do. :-)

  3. Angel Says:

    that wasnt my comment posted prior to this….

  4. Stanford Matthews Says:

    Angel:
    I took the editorial liberty of moving your previous comment from the Dixie Chicks post to the Scott Brown post on high turnout. Your name/link appeared on MY last comment because the only way I could easily edit was with your name/link and then I forgot to return to my signature until now when I noticed the oops.

    Go ahead, beat me up. Tell me I overstepped with such tyrannical editorial decisions. Come on. I can take it. :-)