Some in the ’science’ community are honest and some created Climategate.
Disclosure of e-mails and documents from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) in Britain — a collaborator with the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — reveals some scientists’ willingness to suppress or massage data and rig the peer-review process and the publication of scholarly work. The CRU materials also reveal paranoia on the part of scientists who believe that in trying to engineer “consensus” and alarm about warming, they are a brave and embattled minority. Actually, never in peacetime history has the government-media-academic complex been in such sustained propagandistic lockstep about any subject.
Some ‘deny’ Climategate while others have known about the fraud for a long time.
“My presentation will be the unique one,” said Inhofe, a climate change skeptic who is investigating allegations that some scientists manipulated data to provide proof of global warming. “They’re not even close on votes in the United States Senate.”
“They’re cooking the science,” Inhofe said. “The same things that came out on these e-mails is what I said four years ago.”
You need a flawless scheme and ‘perps’ who can carry it out in order to commit the perfect crime.
Obama’s Top Climate Advisers Can’t Get Doomsday Story Straight While Testifying Before Same Committee on Same Day
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Last week, White House science czar John Holdren told members of the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming that changes in global temperatures could mean a rise in sea levels of 6 feet or more in a century.
But Joan Lubchenco, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, told the same committee on the same day that changes in global temperatures could mean a rise in sea levels of up to 3.5 feet in this century.
As with all investigations the best strategy is to follow the money.
As for Al Gore, the former Vice President brings emotional fervor to his carbon crusade. He travels the country displaying charts and graphs, quoting scientific experts and appealing to philosophers and religious leaders to save the planet from global warming. But he says nothing about his business partners who yearn to trade on the emerging carbon market. And the media pay no attention to the companies offering “carbon advisory services” that will profit from federal carbon emission controls.
Al Gore’s scam is not especially creative. His strategy is well known in the life insurance market. An old technique is to create fear in the mind of your prospect that their spouse and other dependents will be left penniless if they expire prematurely. The claim is the life insurance they buy will protect them from that fate. While the salesman may actually believe he is helping you he knows his income depends on a successful outcome to the presentation. Then there are the scam artists whose only interest is getting rich off your fear, real or imagined.
The faster someone wants you to act on their suggestion the more likely it is a scam.
Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com
Soros scheming at Copenhagen: Eco-redistribution of wealth (Michelle Malkin)
This entry was posted on Friday, December 11th, 2009 at 1:26 am and is filed under Public Affairs, Money Matters, Science, wordpress, Politics, Gore, conspiracy, disclosure, ethics, U.N., Environment, Business.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
