Comments on: Gonzales v Carhart and Examining Pro-choice

by: kathy

Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:30:58 +0000

Oh, one more thing, I commented at BSC that the recent ‘bombshell’ to hit the Haditha Marines prosecution was a story that stunned me more than I had been stunned in a very long time. I did not expect that to happen again so soon, the stunned part that is.

I keep up on the facts of this case as you know,,, and it snuck up on me too (the MSM writing the story part anyway, I know the facts of the case so something like this was bound to happen.)

… Little birdie tells me more to come.. stay tuned..

Have a great day!
-Kathy

by: Stanford Matthews

Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:53:09 +0000

David:
I wonder if you are surprised that the abortion issue was raised here again. Other than what I have already posted, I will take this opportunity to express my reaction to your previous statement that you are pro-choice and ask, could it be your choice is for people to choose not to opt for abortion?

by: David

Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:33:59 +0000

“Therefore, I honestly submit that the ACLU, Senator Barbara Boxer and others are entirely and completely misguided in opposing the Supreme Court ruling in Gonzales v Carhart.”

And i would submit that you are far too kind to the ACLU. Boxer and their ilk. “Depraved” is the kindest characterization I can place upon their stance.

As to abortion for rape or incest… is the resultant foetus a guilty party? Sure, it may be traumatic for a woman to bear a child resulting from such evil acts, but surely less “traumatic” than the death that child suffers as a result of a “choice” made to terminate its life–a choice in which the child has no say, no choice–just as the child had no choice in its manner of conception and so is the only completely innocent party involved. Surely justice quails at the condemnation of the innocent for the acts of the guilty?

The abortion holocaust is primarily the result of greed, self-indulgence and sloth that are the natural outgrowth of our ever more “infantilized” extended adolescence culture. Me, me, me and my, my, my feelings.

*feh* “Buck up. Grow up. Be an adult,” I keep wanting to say every time I see yet another manifestation of this sicker and sicker “freedom without responsibility” culture.

by: Stanford Matthews

Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:04:51 +0000

I had abandoned keeping up with this issue. Having concluded that it would never be solved, it seemed pointless to study if there was little chance of finding a solution on which most could agree. But after being brought back into it by the Supreme Court case and hearing people opposing the decision as against women’s rights and casually dismissing the rest of the discussion by omission, a major flaw in the entire pro-choice position was exposed.
I still maintain that, not only in terms of the issue of abortion, but all issues, always allowing or always denying a particular choice or option cancels consideration and thought. We then act or do not act without considering the consequences.
How so many people can rise in outraged protest against violence and death for all sorts of reasons, yet so few seem to rise up against this violence and death. 3000+ deaths of Americans in Iraq is often described as unacceptable. Yet 5000+ of the deaths described in this case do not get even close to the same attention by the public. A criteria for decision- making that arrives at that answer needs to be scurinized.
Thanks for stopping by Kathy.
Oh, one more thing, I commented at BSC that the recent ‘bombshell’ to hit the Haditha Marines prosecution was a story that stunned me more than I had been stunned in a very long time. I did not expect that to happen again so soon, the stunned part that is.

by: kathy

Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:11:00 +0000

how anyone can defend the use of the procedure described above is beyond my ability to understand.

MINE TOO! …worse yet, you should see the late term abortion that is STILL legal…

Great post as always!

-Kathy