Blog @ MoreWhat.com

Rarely does one find such a pathetic display to steal votes from the feeble minded portion of the voting public. Obama and Clinton must be targeting voters they view as feeble minded. What other explanation could there be for the totally unconscious arguments offered by these two candidates to rationalize crushing the skulls of babies. Pardon the graphic description but that is exactly what the Supreme Court banned. And talking nice about it won’t change that fact. So one must use the ugly truth about the politically correct terms of partial birth abortion. If you don’t believe that description, read the entire decision at the Supreme Court’s website.

A brief visit to Clinton’s campaign website did not find a position on abortion. All Hillary Rodham Clinton’s references to issues or the text of what she claims are issue statements are vague rhetoric draped with carefully crafted titles to promote her shell game of never taking a clear stand.

Obama has outdone himself on the abortion issue by his unqualified support for partial birth abortion while offering totally unrelated excuses for his position. The only thing clear about such tactics is the intent to sway voters who are too stupid to understand actions have consequences.

While hubby John Edwards was away on his poverty tour begging for votes from the only constituency he hasn’t previously pitched, his wife echoed Democratic party sentiments on partial birth abortion on demand by opposing the Supreme Court decision like her husband’s rivals. They are one big, happy aborting family.

Obama, Clinton and Edwards favor partial birth abortions, abortion on demand and there is no other explanation for it. Cloak it in the false premise of women’s rights or reproductive rights all you want. It is another Democratic party platform item that stresses rights but never responsibility in managing rights. The best thing they have done with their support of totally unrestricted abortion is make voting in 2008 very simple. If you oppose partial birth abortion or abortion of any kind you should vote for someone besides Clinton or Obama or Edwards.

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Obama, Clinton slam court on abortion ruling

Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:15PM EDT
By John Whitesides, Political Correspondent

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama criticized recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions as hypocritical and inconsistent on Tuesday, saying a ruling upholding a late-term abortion ban was part of a concerted effort to roll back women’s rights.

Obama said the court’s 5-4 rulings to uphold the late-term abortion ban, make it harder for women to sue over pay discrimination and strike down race-based school assignment programs were part an effort “to steadily roll back the hard-won rights of American women.”

“At the top of the list was this effort to try to overturn Roe vs Wade or at least try to chip away at it,” Clinton said, adding the Bush administration has waged war against contraception education and “set out from Day One to dismantle reproduction rights around the world.”

Democrats Tout Abortion Rights Position

Earlier in the day, Elizabeth Edwards addressed the gathering as a stand-in for her husband, John Edwards, who is on a poverty tour of the country. She highlighted his support of abortion rights. Like Mr. Obama, Mr. Edwards has been critical of the Supreme Court’s late-term abortion ruling.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 18th, 2007 at 11:05 am and is filed under Public Affairs, wordpress, Politics, campaign, Democrats, Clinton, obama, Edwards, Abortion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.