Obama Math Versus G20 Math
The media is rejoicing and the markets are reported to be rallying due to a pledge by nations represented at the G20 summit to inject one trillion dollars to several ‘world’ bodies which will distribute the funding to nations around the world. There are no details on how the distribution will be managed.
The 2009 G20 summit is nothing more than a political tool. Think about it. One trillion dollars ‘pledged’ by the 20 nations who represent 90% of the world’s GDP, 80% of the trade and 2/3 of the populaion. The US alone is spending trillions on its own economic problems and currently is debating a nearly 4 trillion dollar proposed budget.
And the media and markets are going wild with joy. That makes no sense. Either most Americans are right and the money our government is spending in the name of an economic crisis is insanely excessive and the G20 is closer to ‘proportional’ reality or the US numbers are right and the G20 numbers are woefully inadequate. Only one of these conclusions can be right.
One trillion dollars is 1000 billion. Divide that by 20 countries and the average is 50 billion per country to spread around the world. Obama is suggesting the US spend more than half that total ($640 billion) on a downpayment for US health care. These numbers don’t make sense and neither does the G20. Unless you conclude this is all politics all the time.
Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com
GDP (purchasing power parity): GWP (gross world product): $70.65 trillion (2008 est.)
