Comments on: Pelosi in July: New Misdirection for America http://morewhat.com/wordpress/pelosi-in-july-new-misdirection-for-america/ To build consensus on issues Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3 by: Stanford Matthews http://morewhat.com/wordpress/pelosi-in-july-new-misdirection-for-america/#comment-11604 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:36:23 +0000 http://morewhat.com/wordpress/pelosi-in-july-new-misdirection-for-america/#comment-11604 read Nancy Pelosi's quote provided in the post. Or did you not read that far? How about her spin? Democrats supported '' bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform' but then she complains ' Republicans resorted to obstruction.' Is that not having it both ways? Harry Reid controlled the Senate process. He gets to say what is considered, etc. And he was the one to pull the legislation after several versions were manipulated and defeated. So, no, I am not being hypocritical. read Nancy Pelosi’s quote provided in the post.
Or did you not read that far?
How about her spin? Democrats supported ‘’ bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform’ but then she complains ‘ Republicans resorted to obstruction.’ Is that not having it both ways?
Harry Reid controlled the Senate process. He gets to say what is considered, etc. And he was the one to pull the legislation after several versions were manipulated and defeated.

So, no, I am not being hypocritical.

]]> by: Jan http://morewhat.com/wordpress/pelosi-in-july-new-misdirection-for-america/#comment-11603 Tue, 31 Jul 2007 17:19:52 +0000 http://morewhat.com/wordpress/pelosi-in-july-new-misdirection-for-america/#comment-11603 Isn't this a little hypocritical? "...yet another statement equating the Democratic party’s support of amnesty for illegal aliens..." The Democrats supported the legislation that President Bush, a member of the Republican Party, asked for. I don't care if you call it amnesty, but to say it the "Democratic party's support of amnesty" is just a lie. I refused to read the rest of the post, because if you're going to skew the facts yourself, it's sort of silly to read you bitching about other people skewing the facts. Isn’t this a little hypocritical?
“…yet another statement equating the Democratic party’s support of amnesty for illegal aliens…”

The Democrats supported the legislation that President Bush, a member of the Republican Party, asked for.

I don’t care if you call it amnesty, but to say it the “Democratic party’s support of amnesty” is just a lie.

I refused to read the rest of the post, because if you’re going to skew the facts yourself, it’s sort of silly to read you bitching about other people skewing the facts.

]]>