Rights and Responsibilities in America: Civics Literacy (05)

As the United States witnessed a recurring event in its democratic processes, that of the departure of one President and the arrival of another, this blog’s series of posts dedicated to civics literacy presents a brief history of the 31st President of the United States, Herbert Hoover. Given the current conditions on the planet and those present during Hoover’s time this selection seems appropriate. A recent comment on the Sunday news programs available on the broadcast networks cited President Bush expressing a sentiment related to the current financial troubles that he did not want to be Herbert Hoover. Similarly other accounts suggested President-elect Barack Obama favors Abraham Lincoln but also draws on JFK and others.

Pay special attention to the last six paragraphs

Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Herbert HooverHerbert Hoover

Son of a Quaker blacksmith, Herbert Clark Hoover brought to the Presidency an unparalleled reputation for public service as an engineer, administrator, and humanitarian.

Born in an Iowa village in 1874, he grew up in Oregon. He enrolled at Stanford University when it opened in 1891, graduating as a mining engineer.

He married his Stanford sweetheart, Lou Henry, and they went to China, where he worked for a private corporation as China’s leading engineer. In June 1900 the Boxer Rebellion caught the Hoovers in Tientsin. For almost a month the settlement was under heavy fire. While his wife worked in the hospitals, Hoover directed the building of barricades, and once risked his life rescuing Chinese children.

One week before Hoover celebrated his 40th birthday in London, Germany declared war on France, and the American Consul General asked his help in getting stranded tourists home. In six weeks his committee helped 120,000 Americans return to the United States. Next Hoover turned to a far more difficult task, to feed Belgium, which had been overrun by the German army.After the United States entered the war, President Wilson appointed Hoover head of the Food Administration. He succeeded in cutting consumption of foods needed overseas and avoided rationing at home, yet kept the Allies fed.

After the Armistice, Hoover, a member of the Supreme Economic Council and head of the American Relief Administration, organized shipments of food for starving millions in central Europe. He extended aid to famine-stricken Soviet Russia in 1921. When a critic inquired if he was not thus helping Bolshevism, Hoover retorted, “Twenty million people are starving. Whatever their politics, they shall be fed!”

After capably serving as Secretary of Commerce under Presidents Harding and Coolidge, Hoover became the Republican Presidential nominee in 1928. He said then: “We in America today are nearer to the final triumph over poverty than ever before in the history of any land.” His election seemed to ensure prosperity. Yet within months the stock market crashed, and the Nation spiraled downward into depression.

After the crash Hoover announced that while he would keep the Federal budget balanced, he would cut taxes and expand public works spending.

In 1931 repercussions from Europe deepened the crisis, even though the President presented to Congress a program asking for creation of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to aid business, additional help for farmers facing mortgage foreclosures, banking reform, a loan to states for feeding the unemployed, expansion of public works, and drastic governmental economy.

At the same time he reiterated his view that while people must not suffer from hunger and cold, caring for them must be primarily a local and voluntary responsibility.

His opponents in Congress, who he felt were sabotaging his program for their own political gain, unfairly painted him as a callous and cruel President. Hoover became the scapegoat for the depression and was badly defeated in 1932. In the 1930’s he became a powerful critic of the New Deal, warning against tendencies toward statism.

In 1947 President Truman appointed Hoover to a commission, which elected him chairman, to reorganize the Executive Departments. He was appointed chairman of a similar commission by President Eisenhower in 1953. Many economies resulted from both commissions’ recommendations. Over the years, Hoover wrote many articles and books, one of which he was working on when he died at 90 in New York City on October 20, 1964.

For more information about President Hoover, please visit
Herbert Hoover Library and Museum

3 Responses to “Rights and Responsibilities in America: Civics Literacy (05)”

  1. Perri Nelson Says:

    “while people must not suffer from hunger and cold, caring for them must be primarily a local and voluntary responsibility.”

    I’m still amazed that people don’t understand this. The left’s solutions to all social problems seems to be: Tax everyone, moving all of the tax revenues to Washington; Filter the revenue through bureaucracies to feed the budgets of various government agencies; Feed the budgeted moneys back to State agencies where it will be filtered through additional layers of bureaucracy before finally being spent on local projects that have to comply with layer upon layer of regulation making simple purchasing or disbursement decisions more expensive.

    Lots of money gets wasted that way. It would be so much simpler and more efficient to simply tax locally to spend locally. There would be fewer restrictive regulations on how the money could be spent and disbursed as well, regulations that could be more closely tailored to local conditions.

    Of course, if you look at it, it seems that the real purpose behind all of this is to keep government employees in circumstances that guarantee a paycheck rather than meeting the needs of the people. The left would never admit to that though.

  2. DragonLady Says:

    To add a bit to what Perri said, with the federal government dispursing the funds, those receiving said funds are beholden somewhat to said government, and therefore more likely to vote for those giving them the money not realizing where the money is really coming from. That, of course, is because Robin Hood is never portrayed as the theif he really was.

  3. Stanford Matthews Says:

    Change you can believe in. Yes we can. Just words, just speeches. A few executive orders today to delay criticism from his supporters.

    It appears the initial threat of holding up HRC’s nomination to Secretary of State was exactly that. It appears and then disappears. Keeping up appearances? A symbolic gesture from Cornyn?

    Already Nobama is hearing feedback that his Iraq withdrawal is ‘too ambitious’.

    Perri, what always bothers me about day to day public discussions of government spending is this. As I mentioned in other comments and posts here, there is a list developing in the bulletin board section on Congress and the bailout. While collecting and posting separate items on each rep and any associated press releases etc., I have been to many Congressional websites lately.

    It was a reminder from the last time. There is a dominant theme of publishing press releases describing the cash the rep takes credit for obtaining for his constituents. Money for all kinds of projects and other waste.

    State and local POLS are quick to make statements that the FED should pay for this or that. Or they brag about or suggest getting money from Uncle Sam. That euphemistic rhetoric or similar distracts from the truth that state and local POLS and the public have some strange notion that the money from the FED is printed especially for them. No one admits they are just stealing from another pile of public funds supplied by taxpayers nationwide.

    It is not then difficult to understand how the current craze over spending tax dollars like it is manna from heaven. While I favor tax cuts, how can we continue to spend in the ‘red’ and on top of that try to lower revenues with tax cuts?

    Ya, I know, borrow more money neither we or the lender (China) have to spend.

    And I think oh great DragonLady that this responds to your comment as well. It becomes a viscious circle. Those in favor of accepting a nanny state and those willing to provide it prolong the agony of sensible policy and governing by sustaining a lifestyle that magically turns living off the government into an art form. One that weaves its evil by turning generations of citizens into helpless morons who cannot even provide the complete version of this partial display of the P of A.

    ….And to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all