Romney Ups Stakes for Volatile GOP Field
One could draw the conclusion that Mitt Romney’s business acumen and disciplined approach to problem solving is at work even when appraising his rivals. Speaking to the chances of nomination for Fred Thompson and Mike Huckabee, Romney began his response in an interview assessing the need for campaign ‘ground support’ and funding. Remarks given on the late start by Thompson and late up tick in the Huckabee campaign gave heavy weighting to raising funds early when they are more plentiful and developing strong support, presumably in early voting states.
Thompson remarked that his words and ideas were what would be the ultimate test and were something money can’t buy. That assumes, not unlike many current and past candidates, the money does not drive the message. Since Thompson is late to the game by necessity or design, it would also be reasonable to conclude he prepared a message like that since he is late and does not have everything in place, which probably includes the campaign warchest.
Other candidates, like John McCain, draw attention to the importance of momentum closer to the elections. If polling is any indication, nationally it has been Giuliani and Thompson followed by McCain and Romney. There is a large margin between the top two and number three and four. Momentum has certainly worked for Romney. He was in single digits early on and still is in some states but nationally he hovers in the mid-teens ahead of McCain in many states and the front runner in half or more of the early states. His large lead in Iowa and New Hampshire could trigger much momentum with back to back wins.
It is certainly too early to determine much with Thompson entering the race only this week. The daily tracking polls have had as much or more movement on the Dems side just after Thompson’s announcement. Caucus and primary elections are drawing closer yet there is still much to observe. A campaign strategist offered this assessment. Every campaign must experience a devastating event some time during a campaign. If he is right, that may be what has to happen before any noticeable difference is reflected in the polls. Maybe it won’t happen before the first election.
Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com
Romney Ups Stakes for Volatile GOP Field
By RON FOURNIER – 7 hours ago

September 9th, 2007 at 12:20 am
Romney is an intelligent, accomplished person. Fred is a lobbyst, movie star, good’ol boy. Fred says the government is broken. If he is right, Romney is much more capable of fixing it than Fred.
September 9th, 2007 at 2:18 am
Ben,
I absolutely agree with all that you have said. Mitt Romney is by far the best candidate for president anyone could choose. As a lobbiest, Fred Thompson is part of the problem not the solution.
September 9th, 2007 at 4:06 am
hey there buddy!..seems like Romney is getting stronger and proving himself worthy eh?..:)
September 9th, 2007 at 5:32 am
This may be the first time I can vote where it is not a matter of picking the lesser of two evils. I prefer Romney but if he is not nominated any one of the other three would do. That means I would not feel bad about voting for any one of the GOP candidates.
Can’t say the same for the Dems’ candidates. Assume you had to vote for one of the Democratic party candidates. Which one would you select? Sux doesn’t it?
Thanks for stoppin’