UN Warns Against Return to Iraq

crossposted at:
Reject the UN
While good news from Iraq should never be overlooked with the MSM tendency to focus on the bad, overstating the good news would be counterproductive at the least. With the uber liberal left totally invested in defeat at every turn and sporting their surrender monkey mascot, the stunning success of the troop surge in Iraq was enough evidence for the media to begin covering positive stories about Iraq but that is not the case with White Flag Harry Reid and his sidekick No Way Nancy.

Enter the much criticized United Nations. They may have published accurate figures on some of the stats of returning Iraqis based on a comparison with the following report from Alsumaria TV.
But the UN can’t be expected to be on the same page with others on all information and they have a knack for overstating the obvious. Besides numbers on returning Iraqis, the UN states Iraq offered $15 million to Syria as financial assistance for dealing with refugees. The report above puts the number at $52 million. But then the UN is not known for their ability to handle money properly. They also warn that encouraging Iraqis to return home is a bad idea since the region is still not stable enough. Do you suppose the Iraqis are capable of making that distinction on their own? Who should know better how things are going? A group that left Iraq at the first sign of trouble or citizens thoroughly invested in the future of Iraq? And of course the UN makes the case that Iraqis are returning because of visa requirements in refugee host countries like Syria and because they are running out of money. They reject the notion that any are returning due to the improved security conditions. Certainly violence is not a thing of the past in Iraq but drawing conclusions about anything in the region is a risky proposition.
UN refugee agency warns against return to Iraq
Fri Nov 23, 9:54 AM ET
“Presently, there is no sign of any large-scale return to Iraq,” she added.
Then there is the estimate in general of people displaced as a result of violence in Iraq. Some reports say about 2 million Iraqis are displaced while others have the number at 4 million. This might be explained by not separating internal from external displacements.
The number of internally displaced people, or IDPs, in Iraq grew by 16 percent in September - to 2,299,425, the Red Crescent said. That figure has skyrocketed since the beginning of 2007, when less than half a million people were listed as displaced.
The following report from the BBC reflects the most common report on the numbers but there are plenty of others out there.
Iraq’s ministry of migration told the BBC about 1,000 people were returning every day.
Note that the BBC indicates Iraq’s ministry puts the number at 1,000 per day yet the UN estimates 45,000 during a one month period. And the UN supplied numbers on refugees to each country plus internal and external displacements seems to be inflated when compared to other reports. Since they just admitted their AIDS numbers were exaggerated it would not be unreasonable to suspect this is another math failure for the United Nations. Still, the most annoying part of the UN’s take on Iraq is that they have a take at all. It would be nice if there were a few issues and events in which they did not feel compelled to butt in. In other words, keep your opinions, suggestions and urgings to yourself from time to time. If for no other reason than to not be so predictable.
There are so many tasks that the United Nations fails at miserably it would be in their best interest and certainly ours if they would limit their involvement in world affairs to focus on a handful of items in an effort to improve their performance. Rather than take on all the world’s problems their own Millennium Development Goals failures should be adequate proof they need to reduce their workload. Please, take this hint. Scale it back to maybe one project per year. If you can successfully complete one, then the following year try two, and so on.
The United Nations performance does not indicate they should be giving advice to anyone. And that certainly includes the Iraqis. These people have suffered enough and they are entitled to make their won decisions without unnecessary interference from the UN.
In conclusion, it may be fair to state that hundreds of Iraqis are returning to Iraq. The rate may be as high as 1,000 or so per month. The total number of persons displaced may be 4 million. And the US military troop surge has made it possible for people to consider returning. It is likely they understand that the risks of violence still exist but the situation is much improved. More people speaking on Iraq could express the good news rather than focusing on the obvious and typical darker sides of war. That can help bring this to a speedier conclusion.

November 25th, 2007 at 11:46 am
[…] White House UN Warns Against Return to Iraq » This Summary is from an article posted at Blog @ MoreWhat.com on Sunday, November 25, 2007 This article’s contents are copywritten by the author of Blog @ MoreWhat.com . Please click "View Original Article…" below to view the article. Summary Provided by Technorati.comView Original Article at Blog @ MoreWhat.com » Recent Discussion Topics […]
November 25th, 2007 at 7:22 pm
Pick and choose the stats you fight, call the UN down for being imperfect, and apply frighteningly critical names to people who say what you disagree with. What blogs are all about!
November 26th, 2007 at 7:34 pm
IRAQ WAR FAUCETS
On the pretense of a nuclear threat, President Bush illegally turned on two faucets - full force: out of one flows the American People’s precious wealth, and out of the other faucet flows their priceless blood.
This is a black mark on his name that can never be erased – to damn him forever in history.
November 27th, 2007 at 4:47 pm
Its a bit much to hear all this hype about how well the “surge is working”.
What the rightwing refuses to consider is the obvious. The terrorists/insurgents/Al Quaeda or whatever you want to call them made a decision a few months ago. They decided it was best to simply “go home” and wait out the American occupation. They know it can’t last forever. They know that when we do withdraw our troops there will be no effective security for the Iraqi Government in place. In other words, we haven’t defeated the insurgents, they have simply chosen to taken a break for now. They’ll be back when our troop levels come down next year–and probably with a vengeance.
This is much more plausible explanation for what has happened after four + years of unrelenting terrorist attacks.
November 27th, 2007 at 6:17 pm
Thanks for stoppin’. Thanks for taking the time to share your opinions.
November 27th, 2007 at 6:21 pm
“In other words, we haven’t defeated the insurgents, they have simply chosen to taken (sic) a break for now”…tell that to the scores of dead AQI’s. This is so typical of the left, always quick to embrace what they see as defeat, when in fact this has been the most successful counterinsurgency in modern history. Even UBL has admitted as much. The UN is just another organ of the international left.
November 27th, 2007 at 8:42 pm
If the insurgents are taking a break until we leave, that is because of Dingy Reid and Pelosi saying that we will be out of Iraq by a certain date. Of course the insurgents will wait it out, then they will try to overthrow the Iragi government, then who will be blamed for that? The left will say it was Bush’s fault for leaving, they will not take any responsibility for their actions on Iraq. They should all be thrown out of office in the next congressional elections. We need people in congress with BALLS who will not surrender everytime things get tough!
November 27th, 2007 at 10:07 pm
“We need people in Congress with Balls who will not surrender everytime things get tough”
Well, I doubt seriously things are going to go your way in the congressional races. The Rothenberg Political Report and the Cook Political report are forecasting gains of 3-6 seats in the Senate for the democrats. Blame it on 22 GOP seats being up for election this year (as opposed to just 11 dem seats). Blame it on the war. Or, blame it on bad luck. The GOP will be fortunate if it only loses 3 senate seats in this election.
November 27th, 2007 at 10:30 pm
Again, thanks for stoppin’ and sharing opinions. Feel free to add topics and opinions in the forum. The link is near the top in the sidebar.