Why Would Anyone Read the NYT?

Another post on what seems to be popular at various locations around the net that represent the Main Stream Media. The term MSM is overused here as well as other places and may not be such a useful identifier any longer. What the hell is main stream anyway? Is it an indication of the most common, most popular, most authoritative or simply the most commercially successful media outlets that cause their content to be the most influential among large audiences based on market share? These are probably questions for another post, another time.

the newsstand

The MSM source reviewed for most popular content and additional categories today is the NYT. It was the first source that came to mind based on prolonged attention of the newspaper itself in the MSM as well as the blogosphere, talk radio and elsewhere. You can decide what the following information implies about the New York Times.

Articles most frequently e-mailed by NYTimes.com readers.

  1. Boom Times for Dentists, but Not for Teeth
  2. Picky Eaters? They Get It From You
  3. Dress Codes: After Years of Being Out, the Necktie Is In
  4. David Brooks: The Odyssey Years
  5. Makers Pull Infant Cold Medicines
  6. Op-Ed Contributor: How China Got Religion
  7. Thomas L. Friedman: Generation Q
  8. Preoccupations: E-Mail Is Easy to Write (and to Misread)
  9. Paul Krugman: Sliming Graeme Frost
  10. Doris Lessing Wins Nobel Prize in Literature

The first story is about increasing dental fees and lack of insurance blamed for people ignoring cavities. That is the number one emailed item. If you are postponing or procrastinating on dental care, significant dental problems will only allow that for a limited time before it is unavoidable if only due to the pain. How many people get cavities after the cavity-prone early years? Are dentists being added to the list of villains?

Number two offers a study that ‘blames’ genetics as the cause of ‘picky eaters’ habits. Does it seem like genes are getting a bad rap? Do we now get to blame all undesirable behavior on mother nature? Is there any responsibility placed on individuals? Is it a matter of choice or are we victims of circumstance?

Item number three indicates 20 and 30 something men are favoring less casual dress in opposition to the earlier trend named ‘casual Fridays.’ Does this mean the clothing stores will discontinue buying inventory all of which looks like sleepware? Will young women decline to wear undergarments on the outside or refrain from covering only what is legally required?

David Brooks1Fourth place finds columnist David Brooks being bested by two villains and a fashion statement. One can only ponder whether his writing is viewed favorably or not. As it would appear he performs the conservative duties countered by Mark Shields liberal leanings on the PBS News Hour hosted by Jim Lehrer in their Friday discussions, it is again left to the audience to determine the value of the commentary. Was the author who wrote for the Weekly Standard that ended up at the NYT late to the game? Brooks once suggested that an opportunity to work for the NYT was the holy grail or brass ring of journalistic ambitions. The timing suggests that the move came after the revelation exposing plagiarism within the ranks and lax oversight by management amid allegations of publishing habits that posed a clear and present danger to national security.

The remaining contents of the NYT most emailed list are left for the reader to inspect if so inclined. The titles supplied in this post give an indication of the content represented and need no additional explanation. There are brief summaries available at the NYT for those reluctant to read the full stories. That list as well as the most searched terms should give anyone an idea of the readership of the NYT.

Al GW GoreThat climate, global warming, Al Gore and arctic are found on the list may suggest an obsession with the environment and an unhealthy fixation on one side of an issue. The presence of other groups of related search terms may also suggest the thinking of the audience and any successful business knows appealing to their preferred market reflects well on the bottom line. Is it too foolish to propose that content appealing to a broad range of viewpoints could be equally successful?

  1. clinton
  2. cancer
  3. crime
  4. climate
  5. darfur
  6. conspiracy
  7. diana
  8. bush
  9. immigration
  10. china
  11. united health care
  12. iraq
  13. global warming
  14. india
  15. education
  16. nobel prize
  17. health
  18. al gore
  19. supreme court
  20. turkey
  21. ann coulter
  22. jena 6
  23. columbia university
  24. gay
  25. science
  26. iran
  27. college
  28. armenian genocide
  29. the odyssey years
  30. korea
  31. blackwater
  32. doris lessing
  33. none
  34. october
  35. radiohead
  36. david brooks
  37. food
  38. school shooting
  39. drugs
  40. religion
  41. business
  42. dentist
  43. arctic
  44. marketing
  45. sex
  46. crossword
  47. myanmar
  48. women
  49. thomas friedman
  50. generation q


Stanford Matthews
MoreWhat.com

Trackposted to Right Pundits, Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson’s Website, , The Random Yak, guerrilla radio, Big Dog’s Weblog, Right Truth, Stix Blog, The Populist, Shadowscope, Leaning Straight Up, Cao’s Blog, The Bullwinkle Blog, The Amboy Times, The Pet Haven, Adeline and Hazel, Nuke’s, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, third world county, Faultline USA, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, CORSARI D’ITALIA, and Church and State, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

4 Responses to “Why Would Anyone Read the NYT?”

  1. University Update - Iraq - Why Would Anyone Read the NYT? Says:

    […] White House Why Would Anyone Read the NYT? » This Summary is from an article posted at Blog @ MoreWhat.com on Friday, October 12, 2007 This article’s contents are copywritten by the author of Blog @ MoreWhat.com . Please click "View Original Article…" below to view the article. Summary Provided by Technorati.comView Original Article at Blog @ MoreWhat.com » 10 Most Recent News Articles About Iraq […]

  2. Joyce Russell Says:

    States Lower the Medicaid Boom

    In a bid to control their Medicaid budgets, the States have cynically reduced access to dental care by holding the reimbursement level at or below the cost of providing the dental services — Thus perpetuating the dental double-standard.

    In response to the realities of dental economics, more dental schools have gone out of business than new ones have opened during the last 15 years.

    In the 1960’s and 1970’s the government subsidized medical education in an effort to flood the marketplace with physicians. However, economists were surprised to discover that most physicians had found ways to make avery good living. The failed policy actually caused an explosion in medical costs instead of cutthroat competition among the MDs.

    Congress can open the Purse to expand the Alaska dental nurse program into the continental US but you can be sure they won’t be opening their mouths in those clinics on Capitol Hill.

    It’s the kind of problem that begs the question of the next President: “What would Milton Friedman do?”

  3. Stanford Matthews Says:

    If one refers to government subsidies as public funding identifying the source as tax dollars it might convince more people to oppose its use for private sector projects. If the project cannot survive on its own then it may not be a practical or worthy endeavor.

  4. Connecting News, Commentaries and Blogs at NineReports.com - Says:

    […] …Blogged about at Why Would Anyone Read the NYT? - blog @ morewhat.com, - Last Updated - 2 minutes ago  firegeezer.com - Last Updated - Tuesday October 16  Why Would Anyone Read the NYT? Based on prolonged attention of the newspaper itself in the MSM as well as the blogosphere, talk radio and elsewhere, you can decide what the following information implies about the New York Times. Home |  Widgets |  Terms |  Privacy Copyright 2007 CDR Networks _uacct = “UA-2278587-1″; urchinTracker(); […]